Recently, one of Daly Myers fans argued that we should all ignore me and
listen to Dale, in spite of the fact that he deliberately mispositioned
President Kennedy and Gov Connally in his video, because unlike the rest
of us poor slobs, Myers is an "expert".

Doing a quick check on the web, I attempted to find out if Mr. Myers
held a degree in forensic animation or some other field which would
qualify him for this kind of precision analysis, but it appears that he
has no such credentials - not even in Autocad.

I did however, discover that he took part in one other project, which
certainly defines his skills and his niche in the world of digital
animation. You can not only view it here, but for the meager sum of
$1.99, can buy it for yourself!

http://robojr.com/

That's right folks - Mr. Myers other achievement was a 6 minute cartoon,
circa 1994, depicting a baby robot who borrows the family UFO and gets
hisself into all kinds of trouble!

My video doesn't look nearly as snazzy as Robo, but it is honest and
correct. View it here, and make your own call on it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xP0mH_u_no

I'm taking an Un-Official "Burb Poll"...

How many of you posters out there in Webland would agree to this premise:

In same era, with the same technology/tools available...

Would Kennedy have SURVIVED his trip through Dealey IF the British Secret
Service OR the Royal Canadian Mounted Police - Special Services Branch had
had the job of protecting the President of the U.S.in Dallas that day?

Yes? or
No?
Which One?
And Why?

I await the numbers...and the American fur-flying....

Burb (The Un-Official Pollster of John McAdams)
P.S. If the Yeti post gets thru and this one doesn't...

At 4:50 in my video, I overlayed a white line on the image I took from
the finished portion of your presentation - that is, the part where you
replaced the wireframes with a completed image.

That line measured 18 degrees, in 2D space, which was exactly the angle
of your own trajectory line, which you cut off after switching to the
finished animation.

Do you deny that your own line measured *exactly* 18 degrees, as mine
did? If so, I will be glad to post an image with an overlayed protractor
to prove otherwise.

If you agree with me, then please explain why your own line, had you not
terminated it at JFK's back, would extend to a point well below Governor
Connally's back wound - exactly as I pointed out in my video.

Please be specific.

Robert Harris

This was one of my first videos. It demonstrates quite clearly that the
back of JFK's head was indeed, blown out and that the damage occurred a
fraction of a second following the explosion at frame 313.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVfIh-8nXyQ

Robert Harris

I think this video settles the issue once and for all. See if you don't
agree.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql6VqZDiC6s

Robert Harris

It is disappointing, though not surprising that Mr. Myers has to use a
surrogate to present his defense of my video, but let's take a look at his
arguments.

Keep in mind, that I simply pointed out that he reduced the distance
between JFK and Connally, in the first part of his presentation, using
what was obviously, a hastily thrown together wireframe of the limousine,
and that he switched back to an accurate rendering of the two victims
after finishing his "analysis".

Myers arguments in the order presented:

1. Harris is ignorant.

2. These same charges have been made "numerous times" by others (not
exactly surprising:-) who are therefore, also ignorant.

3. Harris relies on short attention spans to present his arguments.

4. Harris pretends to be knowledgeable.

5. Harris pretends that he can look at a two dimensional drawing and
determine a three dimensional trajectory.

6. Jack White was full of crap, so somehow, that proves Harris is the
same.

On Aug 18, 8:29 pm, "Guest" aol.com> wrote:

First follow the money. Oil-depletion talk taking enormous profits from
oil barons. Of course they were obscene, how else could a runaway get a
stake from some poker winnings and be the richest man...

This was one of my first videos. It demonstrates quite clearly that the
back of JFK's head was indeed, blown out and that the damage occurred a
fraction of a second following the explosion at frame 313.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVfIh-8nXyQ

Robert Harris

I think this video settles the issue once and for all. See if you don't
agree.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql6VqZDiC6s

Robert Harris

Dale and I go way back, to when I emailed him in 1995 in response to his
article in Toaster magazine.

To this day, I am still waiting for him to reveal the angles he used to
conclude that a line through the known wounds in JFK and Connally
pointed directly back at Oswald.

This video demonstrates that Myers is well aware that the angles don't
work, which is why he deliberately misrepresented the position of the
two victims.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xP0mH_u_no

Robert Harris