| Re: Question for David VP - McClelland's dwg.bmp |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.assassination.jfk · Group Profile
Author: David Von PeinDavid Von Pein Date: Jul 21, 2007 00:29
>>> "First, what about my question?" <<<
Sorry, but the forum software has been mighty screwed-up the last few
days. Maybe I missed something.
>>> "I asked you, if, just for argument's sake, there WAS such a wound, do
you think HB&F (and, perhaps a paranoid superior or two) would have
reported its nature (size/location, etc.) precisely and unambiguously and
expect for one minute that the majority of the thousands of bonafide and
arm-chair forensic experts across the nation would buy the notion that
such a wound was caused by a shot from the rear?" <<<
Yes, I do think that REASONABLE armchair experts would buy that
explanation. And do you know why? BECAUSE IT WOULD BE THE TRUTH. Plain and
simple.
Call me gullible. I don't care. I'm asking for it.
>>> "I told you F8 was practically the Rosetta Stone for figuring out this
BOH wound issue...and, after you tell me you don't have a clue what's
being shown in that photo and I offer to send you a very user-friendly,
color coded graphic that illustrates what's being shown in F8, you don't
even have the courtesy or the willingness to accept my offer." <<<
I wouldn't have the slightest idea if you've got it oriented right, now
would I? How COULD I know that? The photo is a mess, as far as my eyes can
tell. Even Baden can't orient the thing in front of TV cameras. And he's a
pathologist.
But send the damn thing if you want...I don't care. It'll still no doubt
look like spaghetti against the kitchen wall to my eyes.
| 
