> On 21 Jan 2008 21:06:48 -0500, Pamela McElwain-Brown
> mindspring.com> wrote:
>

>>Thomas Edward Beckham is certainly a colorful figure. Debate about him
>>ranges far and wide. Was he a con man? Was he for real? Why did he lie?
>>Do we know when he is telling the truth?
>>
>>This curious character plays a central role in Mellen's long-awaited book
>>AF2J. One would think those on the net would be allowed to examine
>>objectively the various aspects of his character and experiences, in order
>>to determine for ourselves his credibility and value.
>>
>>But John, in his inimitable WC apologist style, has managed to create a
>>page for AF2J that attempts (of course) to diminish the significance of
>>the book in general and, in particular, create the impression that Beckham
>>does not deserve to be believed:
>>
>>http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/mellen.htm
>>
>>But then, should we believe John?
>>

>
> You should believe the primary sources.
>
> You do know what those are, don't you?
>
> .John
> --------------
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm