1: Connolly got shot with a separate hit
2: Two shots one on top of the other - almost at the same time
3: An imposter of Oswald in Mexico City and elsewhere. If Oswald were a =
lone nut seeking attention, then why would someone impersonate a guy who =
was a nobody? The only answer is, they knew he was going to be a =
somebody. I wonder why the guy in the photo was never identified? I am =
sure SOMEONE out there knew who he was. He is the proof of a =
conspiracy.
4: The case was "cinched" up a little too soon.
5: Jack Ruby is stalking...
6: Oswald's life is still a mystery - except for thing that point to =
reasons why he allegedly did it.
7: No motive.
8: Walker intelligence/reconnaissance photos only show a house, but no =
people. If you are alone, why do you need photos to plan it out? Why =
did he miss at a stationary target and at closer range, but hit JFK - =
non- stationary at a much great distance with precision?
9: The government was involved with Oswald. That alone shows that he =
was not simply a "lone nut."
10: His Russian assignment is still very suspicious. What was he over = ...

1. It is absolutely impossible to know whether or not the rear scalp (with
pieces of bone adhered to it) was pushed back into place before the
lateral x-rays were taken.

2. It is absolutely impossible to know whether or not the rear scalp had
been stretched and sutured to close up openings (just like Humes, Boswell
and the morticians said it eventually was) before the BOH photo was taken.

3. It is absolutely impossile to rule out the notion that certain members
of the investigations/inquiries (whether they were doing what they thought
was best for the country or not) were reluctant to publish conclusions
that they thought might be misinterpreted as evidance of a frontal shot
and, therefore, a conspiracy....even though those conclusions would have
been more accurate than what they eventually pubished.

That's why autopsies are done and the word of the prosectors should trump,
in spades, what after the fact, non-time-stamped photographs or x-rays
(taken amid unknown circumstances) "appear" to show. This was a monumental
mistake made by those conducting the post-WC inquires/investigations and,
sadly, one that certain "researchers" have based their own conclusions on.

John Canal

A company called "EarthStation1" has just released THE BEST film ever made
on the JFK assassination onto the DVD format for the first time ever (it
was previously released only on VHS, in 1988 and 2000). And as of this
writing in July 2008, the DVD is selling for only $9.99, with free S&H.

That film being (of course) -- David L. Wolper's "Four Days In November"
(from 1964):

www.earthstation1.com/Merchant/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=E&Product_Code...

www.amazon.com/review/RW4LAECVAW7I9

www.imdb.com/title/tt0059197

www.imdb.com/title/tt0059197/board/threads

========================================

MORE JFK BOOK/DVD/VIDEO TALK:

www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/8c9c7a8d21a9a2d7

========================================

Posted July 6, 2007
Expanded August 29, 2007

I submit this old post to argue that the acoustic records raise far more
important questions than whether gun fire were the source of the limiting
pulses on the Dictabelt.

The acoustic records contain several events, which enable testing how
Channel-I would record a brieftone generated on Channel-II. In particular
a loud annoying brieftone accompanied the Channel-II broadcast by Sgt.
Bellah.

http://mysite.verizon.net/a1eah71/temps/trackthree0022.wav

The Bowles tape of the Audograph playing of its disk is the source of this
wave file.

On Channel-I the brieftone, though slightly attenuated by about three db
relative to the voice, is still a conspicuous annoyance. The Bowles tape
of the Dictabelt is the source of the following wave file.

http://mysite.verizon.net/a1eah71/temps/trackone0275.wav

Just to update anyone who is interested:

The CIA requested an extension of the June 11 deadline until August
11.

Ray wrote:

Not sure about your logic there. It is a Federal crime applicable to
anyone, not just military. It is not for a court martial.

What character does Perry Russo play in JFK - I know it's just a bit
part, stand-in really but I'd like to know...thx! Burb

To download immediately, go to:

http://www.saintjohnhunt.com/bond.html

According to the website:

This is the remarkable true story of St. John Hunt and his father E.
Howard Hunt, the infamous Watergate burglar and CIA spymaster. It is
the story of a father's last confession to his son about the CIA,
Watergate, and the plot to assassinate President John F. Kennedy. It
is also the story of a family destroyed by the national tragedy of
Watergate, of a son who lost his mother in a mysterious plane crash at
the height of the scandal, and lost his father to prison in the wake
of that scandal. It is a story of loss and redemption, of secrets and
their consequences.