John Canal wrote:

Because the skull can be extensively fractured underneath intact scalp.

Other than the doctors, who else in Trauma Room One at Parkland Hospital
was interviewed regarding the nature of the President's wounds? Were any
nurses, orderlies, non-medical personnel present who saw first hand the
President's wounds?

For the remainder of my article on Mr. Shackelford, I'll just refer
folks to my website, as I usually do these days:

http://www.jfk-online.com/judythshack.html

Unless, of course, Martin objects again.

Dave

The following information about Martin Shackelford has long been available
at my website, but Martin says that is insufficient; so I repost it here.

In late 1998, Martin Shackelford contributed an article entitled,
"Garrison's Case Finally Coming Together," to the web-based periodical,
FAIR PLAY.

http://spot.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back_issues/25th_Issue/shaw.html

With regard to both its overall factual inaccuracy, its many unexplained
leaps in logic, and its persistent reliance on innuendo, the article was,
to be blunt, appalling. While I did not fancy myself an authority on the
subject of Jim Garrison's ill-fated New Orleans- based JFK conspiracy
probe, I couldn't understand how someone as intelligent and knowledgeable
as Martin Shackelford could write such an ill-informed and frankly
illogical article.

Perhaps most disturbing of all, though, was that the article ignored one
of the most fundamental tenets in research: Cite your sources. If you make
a claim, reveal what your basis for it is and where precisely you got the
information. Otherwise, how is anyone to determine whether the evidence
you cite or the interpretations you've drawn from such evidence are
legitimate?

"Martin Shackelford" sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:GmEbk.11190$cW3.786@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com...

And he said this when?

He's not at all reliable, Martin.

And *especially* not reliable if he just started talking about this.

Sorry, but this "directed" nonsense comes from DeMohrenschildt in the 70s,
when he was literally insane.

The following information about Martin Shackelford has long been available
at my website, but Martin says that is insufficient;

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.assassination.jfk/msg/533ba501cb741942?hl=en&dmode...

so I repost it here.

Back in November 1994, at the Assassination Symposium on Kennedy (ASK) in
Dallas, Canadian bookseller Al Navis gave a presentation in which he made
a startling claim. It concerned Lee Bowers

http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100bowers.html

the eyewitness who, at the moment of the assassination, had a clear view
of the rear of the stockade fence on the grassy knoll, where many theorize
a shot or shots came from.

Navis said that when he was a teenager he had briefly corresponded with
Bowers, and that Bowers wrote to him something that he never told anyone
else: that he had actually seen men fire from behind the fence. If true,
this would be sensational news; but Bowers died in a car accident in 1966

http://www.flash.net/~dperry2/bowers.html

and Navis says he has no idea where the letter is.

On March 13, 1963 a 3-man sniper team positioned themselves at the
University of Havana and waited for a scheduled appearance by Fidel
Castro. Prior to Castro's arrival the men were discovered by Cuban
security police ard arrested.

Another 3-man sniper team, lead by Eddie "Bayo" Perez and two associates
of the "Bayo-Pawley" mission, were sent to kill Castro in the summer of
1963 by CIA asset John Martino. Agency documents confirm that assistance
for this mission came from the JM/WAVE station in Miami.

Following the assassination Martino and the CIA's Frank Sturgis figured
prominently in attempts to link Oswald with Castro. Prior to his death
Martino said the Kennedy assassination "had been an act of retaliation for
an anti-Castro plot" and he was still trying to link Oswald with Castro.

Mobster Johnny Roselli, who was Martino's roommate in Miami, told the same
story to associates. He said the people who killed President Kennedy were
the same conspirators he recruited to kill Castro, and clearly tried to
blame the mafia. Before Roselli was able to identify or provide the names
of these alleged Mafioso he was murdered, as his mafia boss, Sam Giancana,
a year earlier.

On Jul 5, 2:18�am, "Martin Shackelford" sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Martin always has the best sources.

I've always been intrigued by all the characters and groups that CT's
associate with JFK's assassination, Connally's wounding and Tippit's murder.

Please tell who did it, by name. How they did it, by method including
firearms. And how they've fooled the American public for 45 years by
getting away with it without being even detected.

See if any of you have the guts to answer in a straight foward way.

Thanks.

Russ

Couplaquestions...
1) Why is the "C" Bullet so far away from the ledge of the Sniper's
nest, where the shooting took place AND so far away from Bullets "A" &
"B" in DPD's evidence photo of 11-22-63?

2)The cowlich head entry wound from the Fatal Head Shot Bullet - was
that entry wound elongated at all? I can't tell by looking and haven't
found any info on its' shape...;

3) True or False - Lane's allegation that a Dallas citizen, who was in
favor of school integration, was tailed all day on the 22nd by law-
enforcement, as a possible assassin in Dallas that day?

Have atter...Burb