alt.assassination.jfk
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.assassination.jfk only
 
Advanced search
December 2006
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 48
45678910 49
11121314151617 50
18192021222324 51
25262728293031 52
2006
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
alt.assassination.jfk Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: I cannot believe how much paper and cyberspace has been wasted         


Author: Grizzlie Antagonist
Date: Dec 31, 2006 18:36

Piggybacking, since JKO's original response was somehow either deleted
or not archived.

Anthony Marsh wrote:
> James K. Olmstead wrote:
>> "Grizzlie Antagonist" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1167523451.434027.261690@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
>>> James K. Olmstead...
Show full article (8.04Kb)
7 Comments
  Re: No Shots on Police Tape         


Author: jwrush
Date: Dec 31, 2006 17:50

"Anthony Marsh" comcast.net> wrote in message
news:6_-dnRIikpoHhQXYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com...
> jwrush wrote:
>> "Anthony Marsh" comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:BrGdneugaMahyArYnZ2dnUVZ_r_inZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> jwrush wrote:
>>>> "Anthony Marsh" comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:UaCdnejdipAEyAjYnZ2dnUVZ_oDinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> jwrush wrote:
>>>>>> "Anthony Marsh" comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:4MydnaLQG5i7tAnYnZ2dnUVZ_h63nZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>> jwrush wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Anthony Marsh" comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:0OednaMY3vPKVg_YnZ2dnUVZ_sTinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>>> jwrush wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Anthony Marsh" comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:zPSdnbjjdOe5CgzYnZ2dnUVZ_vfinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> jwrush wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Anthony Marsh" comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:lOKdnQpfcYwpDg3YnZ2dnUVZ_uPinZ2d@comcast.com... ...
Show full article (6.14Kb)
1 Comment
  Re: WC shows bag stuffed with dismantled MC too long         


Author: Backstreet Aftermath
Date: Dec 31, 2006 17:41

Bottom Post
Date: Fri, Dec 29, 2006, 10:38am (EST-1) From: newdecentpro@hotmail.com
(Gerry Simone (O))
>From Wesley Frazier's original testimony, we can ascertain directly and
from its context, that a dismantled Manlicher-Carcano carbine inside a
brown bag, was not cupped at the bottom by Oswald's hand and held under
his arm pit at the other end.

<>

Mr. FRAZIER - He got out of the car and he was wearing the jacket that has
the big sleeves in them and he put the package that he had, you know, that
he told me was curtain rods up under his arm, you...
Show full article (11.13Kb)
no comments
  Re: Marsh claims the neck exit round "flew over the windshield"         


Author: Backstreet Aftermath
Date: Dec 31, 2006 17:35

Don't anybody knows that Fuhrman planted ce399!!

ZOOM
no comments
  A Shortcut To Becoming A Lone-Assassin Believer -- Watch The 11/22/63 Real-Time Live TV Coverage         


Author: David Von Pein
Date: Dec 31, 2006 17:34

QUESTION:

WHAT IS ONE OF THE BEST WAYS TO GO ABOUT THE TASK OF DEBUNKING MOST OF THE
MAJOR JFK CONSPIRACY THEORIES (WITHOUT REALLY TRYING TOO HARD)?

ANSWER:

WATCH (OR LISTEN TO) THE ORIGINAL "LIVE" TELEVISION AND RADIO COVERAGE
FROM 11/22/63.....

AND THEN TRY TO PUT YOURSELF INTO THE SHOES OF THE SO-CALLED "PLOTTERS",
WHO (PER MANY THEORISTS) HAD JUST SHOT JOHN F. KENNEDY FROM MULTIPLE
LOCATIONS WHILE USING TWO OR MORE GUNS.....

YOU'LL THEN FIND YOURSELF SAYING (AS I HAVE) -- "THIS STUFF PURPORTED BY
OLIVER STONE AND COMPANY IS JUST FLAT-OUT KOOKY!"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

To those JFK conspiracy theorists who seem to favor the Oliver Stone-like
or Robert Groden-promoted assassination scenarios (that feature a minimum
of three gunmen and anywhere from 6 to 10 gunshots being fired at
President Kennedy in Dallas' Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963) -- I
always suggest to them that they ought to dig up some of the
originally-aired "As It Is Happening" live TV or radio broadcasts from
that dark Friday in American history.
Show full article (10.46Kb)
no comments
  Re: WCR ! A VERY BIG SUCCESS STORY !         


Author: Lone
Date: Dec 31, 2006 17:33

cdddraftsman schrieb:
> It suceeded beyond my wildest expectations . It fulfilled it's mandate ,
> to find the determinable facts of the assassination and the questions
> asked afterwards showed us the lack of critical thinking skills on the
> part of the American Public , that crystalized in the forming of the '
> Critical Community ' . What more could you ask for from a event that had
> no broader meaning then a senseless act of violence ? .............Cheers
> ! ...... :-) .....TL

Heroin, Crack, Child Porn...big success story too!!!
no comments
  Re: I cannot believe how much paper and cyberspace has been wasted         


Author: James K. Olmstead
Date: Dec 31, 2006 13:46

"Anthony Marsh" comcast.net> wrote in message news:BrGdneWgaMauxArYnZ2dnUVZ_r_inZ2d@comcast.com...
> James K. Olmstead wrote:
>> "Grizzlie Antagonist" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1167523451.434027.261690@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
>>> James K. Olmstead wrote:
>>>> "Grizzlie Antagonist" yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1167505301.862306.48030@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> James K. Olmstead wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oswald could not carry the rifle "protruding out in front" of his body with his
>>>>>> hand on the "bottom" of the bag, the distance from the car to the TSBD,
>>>>>> without supporting it with his left hand. A demo in front of a jury would
>>>>>> have made VB into a joke on this. A hypothetical question would be proven
>>>>>> wrong with the physical evidence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think, JKO, that this is in fact a standard military stance when
>>>>> marching in formation while carrying arms, and an ex-Marine would likely
>>>>> have had the experience of marching in this formation. ...
Show full article (4.57Kb)
no comments
  Re: Would someone please put an end to this?         


Author: jwrush
Date: Dec 31, 2006 13:46

"Peter Fokes" wrote in message
news:r94gp2pi6pihlidm0jols0q5sp8598vf5r@4ax.com...
> On 30 Dec 2006 17:26:09 -0600, "Gerry Simone (O)"
> hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Well Mr. Von Pein, I agree 1000%% with you that Spence didn't do a great
>>job (maybe he wasn't trying hard enough or too busy with his practice -
>>Bugliosi was smart to invest his time and efforts because he knew he could
>>write a book on it..heh, heh).
>
> Bugliosi also knew his forced hypothetical response from Frazier to a
> highly speculative question more than two decades after the event was
> virtually worthless. I am sure some LNer will argue it was as valid as
> Frazier's original testimony. Of course, such a statement is simply
> nonsense.
>

Oh, Peter, surely you realize by now that Ozzie did it alone.

If you start claiming that nothing said 2 decades later could be trusted,
then what about things you say 4 decades later?
no comments
  Re: RP on Bag         


Author: James K. Olmstead
Date: Dec 31, 2006 13:42

"Peter Fokes" wrote in message news:muufp2hrtat19c9l8atdi22vuonn9ttbpn@4ax.com...
> On 30 Dec 2006 12:14:22 -0600, "James K. Olmstead"
> neo.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> Pete... the thumb would be pointing towards the bottom edge but about
>>8" away, if this is the proper orientation, which depends on the direction
>>the exhibit photo was taken from (exhibit is not clear on that point). If my
>>orientation is wrong, the thumb would be pointing towards the open end of
>>the bag and the palmprint ridgelines would be pointing in the other direction.
>>
>>The actual ridgelines of interest are in the center area of the bag...the
>>heel of the palm. There are two palm lifelines (white V shape) that frame
>>the actual area.
>>
>>jko
>
> Thanks, jko.
>
> Couldn't this palm print have been made when Oswald was carrying the
> package to the car from the Paine household? ...
Show full article (4.08Kb)
no comments
  How should we regard Oswald's statements in custody?         


Author: Peter Fokes
Date: Dec 31, 2006 11:15

In his book, Till Death Do Us Part, a distinguished prosecuting
attorney by the name of Vince Bugliosi has this say:



"police ... [know] that juries are instructed to view unwritten,
unrecorded self-incriminating statements of a defendant 'with
caution.'"



Indeed they are.

PF
21 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9