|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: Peter FokesPeter Fokes
Date: Jun 8, 2010 06:23
On 5 Jun 2010 15:49:42 -0400, Ed Dolan <74030.3022@ compuserve.com>
wrote:
>Hitchens asked what he thought of Mark Lane, responded with "He's a
>crackpot," adding, "pure and simple, a nut bag". He's a garden-
>variety loon." (Washungton Post, 06/03/10, p. C6).
Will wonders ever cease!
I don't recall Mr. Ed Dolan previously taking the initiative to start
a thread on this newsgroup!
Obviously an avid Post reader though.
:-)
Peter Fokes,
Toronto
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Peter FokesPeter Fokes
Date: Jun 8, 2010 05:53
"Date: November 29, 1963
"To: Director of Intelligence and Research Department of State
"From: John Edgar Hoover, Director
"Subject: ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY, NOVEMBER 22,
1963
"Our Miami, Florida Office on November 23, 1963 advised that the
Office of Coordinator of Cuban Affairs in Miami advised that the
Department of State feels some misguided anti-Castro group might
capitalize on the present situation and undertake an unauthorized
raid against Cuba, believing that the assassination of President John
F. Kennedy might herald a change in U.S. policy, which is not true.
"Our sources and informants familiar with Cuban matters in the Miami
area advise that the general feeling in the anti-Castro Cuban
community is one of stunned disbelief and, even among those who did
not entirely agree with the President's policy concerning Cuba, the
feeling is that the President's death represents a great loss not only
to the U.S. but to all Latin America. These sources know of no plans
for unauthorized action against Cuba.
|
| Show full article (5.42Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: John BlubaughJohn Blubaugh
Date: Jun 8, 2010 05:44
On Jun 6, 2:49 pm, claviger gmail.com> wrote:> JB,
>
>> Conservative policies only work to wreck the environment and to make the
>> poor even poorer and the rich even richer.
>
> Free enterprise has made a majority of people well off, many of them risk
> takers in one way or another, at every level blue collar, white collar,
> small business, et al. When there is open access to the market place
> anyone has the freedom to succeed or fail. In a socialist economy the
> government decides who gets access and who will be a success, and who
> won't.
>
Hey, I am all for free enterprize. I just want to see it work for all
people and it doesn't. I am a business man. I have run my own businesses
and I still work in free market industry.
|
| Show full article (4.19Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: John BlubaughJohn Blubaugh
Date: Jun 8, 2010 05:03
>
> The fact that no one else at the TSBD even remembers Oswald was carrying a
> package screams at us how in attentive most folks are to mundane details
> such as this. Nobody remembered because nobody would have any reason to
> remember.
>
Or, it may mean that LHO was carrying a 27" bag in his palm and under
his arm and no one noticed it.
>> You also forget that there was no residue of any kind from
>> the MC or any mark inside the bag to indicate it was there.
>
> I don't forget. I just don't expect that there were be any such
> residue.
>
There should be unless the MC was kept surgically clean.
|
| Show full article (2.50Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: John BlubaughJohn Blubaugh
Date: Jun 8, 2010 05:03
On Jun 6, 4:35 pm, Sandy McCroskey earthlink.net> wrote:> On Jun 5, 11:37 pm, John Blubaugh yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> On Jun 5, 10:57 pm, bigdog yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>> On Jun 5, 4:35 pm, John Blubaugh yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>> On Jun 4, 8:05 pm, bigdog yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>> On Jun 3, 9:45 pm, John Blubaugh yahoo.com> wrote:>
>>>>>> Now, there is the day. When she is put through the test she comes to
>>>>>> the length being 27" The fact is, the testimony was that it was
>>>>>> carried in LHO's palm and UNDER his arm. That means the bag is too
>>>>>> damn short.
> ...
|
| Show full article (2.13Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: John BlubaughJohn Blubaugh
Date: Jun 8, 2010 05:01
On Jun 6, 3:01 pm, Bud fast.net> wrote:> On Jun 5, 10:42 pm, John Blubaugh yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> No spice. The fact is that that you believe LHO was an adequate shot
>>>> when anyone who actually saw him in action said he was a very poor
>>>> shot.
>
>>> Who do you have testimony from that saw him shoot in basic training?
>
>> I don't and that is the problem.
>
> Yah, that is your problem, you concoct elaborate stories from thin
> air.
>
No I do not. I saw people who couldn't shoot moved on through the
system.
|
| Show full article (4.40Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: John BlubaughJohn Blubaugh
Date: Jun 8, 2010 05:00
>
>> I'm afraid it is true. No Marine or soldier was ever kicked out of the
>> service for failing to qualify.
>
> Theres a statement you won`t support.
>
>> Everyone got one of the medals.
>
> Theres another.
>
>> If
>> they couldn't do it on their own, they were just given some bad duty
>> and the scores were fudged to move them through the system.
>
> And still another. Three claims, zero support offered. And none
> coming.
>
|
| Show full article (0.90Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: John BlubaughJohn Blubaugh
Date: Jun 8, 2010 04:56
On Jun 6, 3:00 pm, Bud fast.net> wrote:> On Jun 5, 11:37 pm, John Blubaugh yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Since you are asking for examples, please give an example of another
>>> Marine from the 1950s whose scores were altered to allow than to pass
>>> rifle training when their performance hadn't justified that. Just one.- Hide quoted text -
>
>> I am not the one claiming that every single Marine who entered the service
>> qualified and no scores were ever adjusted to move them on. It is your job
>> to provide the names of Marines who were discharged from the service
>> because they could not learn to shoot.
>
> What ideas of ours requires this information?
>
> Have you shown that what Delgado related and Oswald`s sharpshooter
> ranking cannot exist without cheating...
|
| Show full article (1.12Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman
Date: Jun 8, 2010 04:55
On Jun 5, 8:06 pm, John McAdams marquette.edu> wrote:> On 5 Jun 2010 22:56:00 -0400, cdddraftsman yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>>On Jun 5, 6:23 pm, John McAdams marquette.edu> wrote:>>> This was sent to me by David Lifton.
>
>>> The issue is some of the graphics associated with some of the
>>> anti-Jewish theories Fetzer has been promoting.
>
>>> Note: some of the graphics are vile. If Fetzer had posted them to
>>> support his theories, we moderators would have rejected them.
>
>>> But the purpose here is not to promote antisemitism, but to condemn
>>> it.
> ...
|
| Show full article (3.70Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: cdddraftsmancdddraftsman
Date: Jun 8, 2010 04:36
On Jun 6, 11:53 am, Bud fast.net> wrote:> On Jun 5, 10:48 pm, "J. Raymond Carroll" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> Hi John:
>
>> Congratulations, .john. Your buddies have hacked the Simkin Forum again.
>
> Back to standing on street corners with "The End Is Near" placards
> around your necks.
How could you tell ?
tl
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
