|
|
Up |
  |
|
|
  |
Author: bgarrettmeadowsbgarrettmeadows
Date: Jul 2, 2008 13:39
In Nigel Turner's TMWKK, one of the "three tramps" whose name is
Harelson is interviewed about what--if any- connection he had with
President Kennedy's death.
It wasn't until much later I heard that the former "Cheers" TV star,
and recent star of "No Country for Old Men," Woody Harelson's father
is in prison for murder.
Are the two Harelson's related?
Thanks for entertaining my wild imagination.
|
| |
|
4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Anthony MarshAnthony Marsh
Date: Jul 2, 2008 13:35
claviger wrote:
> Andrew,
>
>>> I assume he knew how to operate the AR-15 and make it ready to fire. How
>>> simple would it be for Hickey to respond and the SS to verify to Donahue
>>> that “I couldn’t accidently fire the weapon because I never chambered
>>> a round or took it off safety. We did a post-incident inventory and I have
>>> witnesses who saw my clip and counted all the cartridges. None were
>>> missing. Here is a detailed report on this procedure.” Why didn’t that
>>> happen?
>> What makes you think it did not happen?
> Have you found an official copy of this post-incident report? If there
> was one on the record it would be helpful for the SS to discourage
> Donahue's investigation early on, and not put Hickey through any
> unnecessary stress.
>
How in Hell would Donahue be able to find such a report back then?
That's the point of a cover-up, to keep documents secret.
|
| Show full article (1.82Kb) |
|
2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Anthony MarshAnthony Marsh
Date: Jul 2, 2008 13:30
>> On Jun 30, 11:25 pm, "Martin Shackelford" sbcglobal.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> JFK and the Unspeakable by James W. Douglass is a fine new book on the case.
>>> Douglass is a prominent Catholic theologian, and a longtime assassination
>>> researcher.
>>> In this book, he provides an excellent discussion of JFK's peace
>>> initiatives, and postulates that those who favored "tougher" Cold War
>>> policies used the CIA to kill him.
>>> He draws on many of the newly-released documents and presents some incisive
>>> analysis of both new and existing documentation.
>>> Some have asked for documentation of the false defector program--it is here.
>>> Douglass provides a devastating discussion of Ruth Paine.
>>> He documents that anti-Castroites brought, not a handful, but a five or six
>>> inch STACK of leaflets to Oswald.
>>> He also found documentation that the CIA routinely created Secret Service ...
|
| Show full article (5.75Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Anthony MarshAnthony Marsh
Date: Jul 2, 2008 13:27
claviger wrote:
> On Jul 1, 7:08 pm, Anthony Marsh comcast.net> wrote:
>> Andrew Mason wrote:
>>> claviger wrote:
>>>> Andrew,
>>>> Jun 11, 11:01 am
>>>>> How is it possible? It is only possible if all the occupants of the
>>>>> followup car, including Hickey, lied. Besides, Hickey was crouching.
>>>>> He did not have a clear sightline to JFK because the windshield was
>>>>> in the way. Why would Hickey aim the rifle at JFK anyway?
>>>> Hickey didn't aim at JFK. He was twisting to his right searching for
>>>> the sniper. A right handed person in that position with a two handed
>>>> grip on a rifle will naturally point it in that direction.
>>>> Jun 22, 10:25 am
>>>>> Hickey said he did not reach for the AR-15 until after the third shot.
>>>>> He reached down, picked it up and loaded it. What evidence do you have
>>>>> that he was wrong?
>>>> The testimony of SSA Bennett and McIntyre seem to contradict Hickey's
>>>> statement.
>>> You have to conclude that Bennett told Hickey to get the AR-15 knowing ...
|
| Show full article (3.68Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Anthony MarshAnthony Marsh
Date: Jul 2, 2008 13:03
claviger wrote:
> Anthony,
>
>>>> So how does the bullet get over the windshield to strike JFK
>>>> if Hickey is not standing? How do you deal with the evidence
>>>> from Bennett and Hickey that he did not have the gun in his
>>>> hands at the time of the heatshot?
>>> Donahue’s theory is Hickey was sitting above the seat, whether on top
>>> the seatback or on the trunk. His feet are in the seat. He attempted
>>> to stand up but lost his balance and fell over.
>> OK, so now you change your story. Donahue's diagram shows Hickey standing
>> up, but now you realize he never did that so you change it to "attempted"
>> to stand up but fell over.
> You seem to forget that Hickey testified he stood up. He attempted to
> stand up and succeeded, but then lost his balance and fell down.
> Witnesses...
|
| Show full article (1.67Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Anthony MarshAnthony Marsh
Date: Jul 2, 2008 13:02
claviger wrote:
> On Jul 1, 10:47 pm, Andrew Mason dufourlaw.com> wrote:
>> claviger wrote:
>>> Andrew,
>>> Jun 24, 9:59 am
>>>> So how does the bullet get over the windshield to strike JFK
>>>> if Hickey is not standing? How do you deal with the evidence
>>>>from Bennett and Hickey that he did not have the gun in his
>>>> hands at the time of the heatshot?
>>> Donahue’s theory is Hickey was sitting above the seat, whether on top
>>> the seatback or on the trunk. His feet are in the seat. He attempted
>>> to stand up but lost his balance and fell over.
>> Donahue should have taken a closer look at Altgens z255 photo. Hickey is
>> not sitting on the trunk or seat back. It appears that he is half
>> standing on the floor.
> SSA Hickey is sitting on something that elevates him above...
|
| Show full article (5.07Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Anthony MarshAnthony Marsh
Date: Jul 2, 2008 13:01
claviger wrote:
> Anthony,
>
>>>> Not according to Hickey. He said the clip was in it
>>>> but it was not loaded (ie. no bullet in the chamber).
>>> I assume he knew how to operate the AR-15 and make it ready to fire. A
>>> simple response by Hickey and verified by the SS to Donahue should
>>> have been “I couldn’t accidently fire the weapon because I never
>>> chambered a round or took it off safety. We did a post-incident
>>> inventory and I have witnesses who took my clip and counted all the
>>> cartridges. None were missing. Here is a detailed report on this
>>> procedure.” Why didn't that happen?
>> He intentionally did not chamber the first round to prevent exactly the
>> type of accident you are speculating about.
>
> So Hickey picked up the gun without putting a round in the chamber?
> What was he going to do, wave it around yelling "Bang-bang! Bang-
> bang!!"
>
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.04Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Anthony MarshAnthony Marsh
Date: Jul 2, 2008 13:00
claviger wrote:
> On Jul 1, 7:22 pm, Anthony Marsh comcast.net> wrote:
>> Grizzlie Antagonist wrote:
>>> On Jun 30, 6:30 pm, claviger gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jun 29, 3:30 pm, Anthony Marsh comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>> claviger wrote:
>>>>>> On Jun 27, 6:13 pm, "tomnln" cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>> I've wondered how the 4 SS agents on the running board made it to the
>>>>>> hospital. Three of them squeezed in the follow-up car. Hickey appears
>>>>>> to be riding in the lap of one of those agents. What are they sitting
>>>>>> on that elevates them above the windshield?
>>>>> You are talking about AFTER the shooting. Hickey was not standing up
>>>>> during the shooting.
>>>> Anthony,
>>>> George W. Hickey, Jr., Special Agent, White House Detail,
>>>> White House garage, United States Secret Service
>>>> ___________________________________________________
>>>> The motorcade then left the airport and proceeded along the parade route. ...
|
| Show full article (4.86Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Anthony MarshAnthony Marsh
Date: Jul 2, 2008 12:56
Dave Reitzes wrote:
> On Jun 30, 12:50 pm, "Martin Shackelford" sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
>> As you know, Barb, I was out of town for more than a week, and have
>> since been otherswise occupied for another week--partly due to my computer
>> being in the shop.
>>
>> Martin
>
>
> But you seem to be here posting now, don't you?
>
> So go ahead and explain:
>
Well, why don't you ask the same stupid questions 100 times?
That will impress your buddies.
> On Jun 11, 1:25�pm, "paul seaton" paulseaton.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Martin -
>
>> Below is an email dated 11 Mar 2002 . It was written by Judyth Baker, and
>> the addressees include both...
|
| Show full article (7.12Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|