"Warm Worm"
email.com> wrote in message
news:fmb90v$lb8$1@luna.vcn.bc.ca...>
> "Don"
>> "Michael Bulatovich"
>>>
>>> "Warm Worm"
>>>> "Ken S. Tucker"
>>>>> "Warm Worm"
>>>>>> "Ken S. Tucker"
>>>>>> "Warm Worm"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just what the world needs; countless floating potential
>>>>>>>>>>>> Chernobyls
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> dubious nuclear-waste sites...
>>>>>>>>>>>> Even regular landfills are becoming a greater concern.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Have you ever done a poop?
>>>>>>>>>>> How many die in car accidents, if one, then ban cars?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's not like the areas around the former sites of car
>>>>>>>>>> accidents will
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> uninhabitable for the next 1000 years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In the absence of facts, hyperbole is substituted,
>>>>>>>>> then delusions and paranoia occurs, that's typical
>>>>>>>>> of people polarizing a complex argument into
>>>>>>>>> simple terms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I simply responded to what was thrown out.
>>>>>>>> If you want to offer up floating nuclear plants as a 'complex
>>>>>>>> argument',
>>>>>>>> fire away.
>>>>>>>> I was conservative with the 1000 years, BTW, because I think it's
>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>> 10000. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are scientists who live at the Chernobyl site,
>>>>>>> and as long as they smoke, they'll be ok, all the
>>>>>>> non-smokers died, it's a thyroid thing.
>>>>>>> Also, the evacuated region is becoming a good
>>>>>>> wilderness area, animals etc have moved in.
>>>>>>> They appear to be doing well, no major inter-
>>>>>>> generational defects. Look at the bright side.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "It is difficult to tally accurately the number of deaths caused by
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> events at Chernobyl, as the Soviet-era cover-up made it difficult to
>>>>>> track
>>>>>> down victims. Lists were incomplete, and Soviet authorities later
>>>>>> forbade
>>>>>> doctors to cite "radiation" on death certificates.[2]
>>>>>> The 2005 report prepared by the Chernobyl Forum, led by the
>>>>>> International
>>>>>> Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and World Health Organization (WHO),
>>>>>> attributed
>>>>>> 56 direct deaths (47 accident workers, and nine children with thyroid
>>>>>> cancer), and estimated that there may be 4,000 extra deaths due to
>>>>>> cancer
>>>>>> among the approximately 600,000 most highly exposed and 5,000 among
>>>>>> the 6
>>>>>> million living nearby.[3]
>>>>>> Although the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone and certain limited areas will
>>>>>> remain
>>>>>> off limits, the majority of affected areas are now considered safe
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> settlement and economic activity."
>>>>>> Yay.
>>>>>
>>>>> Those same stats apply to Toronto and the GTA,
>>>>> but they are secret. Do you know what tetraethyl
>>>>> lead is? Probably Vancouver too.
>>>>> No offense intended but you sound like have very
>>>>> little real experience with industry and safety.
>>>>> (I was a Nuclear Medicine Service Engineer,
>>>>> and did some PR for Secure Energy).
>>>>> Ken
>>
>> See what I mean?
>> It has no choice.
>> Hollow, enormous frontal lobes.
>> So enormous they have cause structural failure in that primary vertical
>> column.
>> Oh yeah, it drools too.
>> Red drool.
>> Thats what the habitual wine glass is for.
