-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= purpose. in publicizing it; censorship in uk.* newsgroups -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The postings to uk.misc newsgroup. generated a very defensive reaction from
Usenet readers in the UK. So much so, that they tried strenuously. to
suppress what was being said, both by breaking the. rules of netiquette in
their responses on the forum, and directly by action to. revoke the account
from which. the postings were issued.
Yet the postings were within the normal boundaries of behaviour. for
uk.misc, and other. less partisan spectators did not see justice in the
censorship which was effected, as the. following excerpt shows;
:Karen. Lofstrom (lofstrom@
lava.net) wrote
:>It does seem that the frequency and the size of his posts. are
:>approaching net abuse.. However, IMHO, they aren't quite there yet. If
:>his postmaster were to. act in this instance, it would raise troubling
:>censorship. issues.