UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.alien.visitors only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.alien.visitors Profile…
 Up
UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!         


Author: Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA
Date: Apr 8, 2008 00:00

UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of
UFO Debunking!

The standing joke among UFO circles is for every 200 UFO
sightings, the Air Force can explain away 201. The possibility that
our Government might withhold or distort information about UFOs might...
Show full article (19.67Kb)
232 Comments
Re: UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!         


Author: Hagar
Date: Apr 8, 2008 10:05

"Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA" zzz.com> wrote in message
news:0c502381-a079-411f-ba0e-4f505f478e31@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of
> UFO Debunking!
> snip LipFlapper BS <

Come back when you can show us a hubcap or a muffler that fell off an UFO.
Even a non-photo-shopped picture would be cool.
You have nothing but extraterrestrial hallucinations.
no comments
Re: UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!         


Author: Bob Casanova
Date: Apr 8, 2008 14:27

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:00:33 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Sir Arthur CB
Wholeflaffers ASA zzz.com>:
>...The History of
>UFO Debunking...

...consists of asking for physical evidence. So far, none
has appeared.


--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
13 Comments
Re: UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!         


Date: Apr 8, 2008 10:36

"Hagar" sahm.name> wrote in message
news:J92dnUj5COdDOGbanZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> Come back when you can show us a hubcap or a muffler that fell off an UFO.

Even a sliver of metal might be sufficient proof. It could prove to be an
alloy impossible to make in a gravity field, which would point to an
extraterrestrial origin.

True believers mischaracterize us scientifically-oriented skeptics as
unwilling to believe in ET visitation until a saucer lands on the White
House lawn and the pilot has lunch with the President. But they
misunderstand the nature of what makes a particular proof "scientific" in
nature. A sliver of ET metal or a fleck of ET dandruff would be sufficient
to meet scientific standards.

--
Show full article (1.15Kb)
no comments
Re: UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!         


Author: Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA
Date: Apr 8, 2008 22:27

Demonstrably wrong, not even old-time debunkers use that tired
technique anymore. How sad you must be :,<
Show full article (0.56Kb)
1 Comment
Re: UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!         


Author: Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA
Date: Apr 8, 2008 22:29

Been there, done that. Debunkers wouldn't know the side of an ET
craft if they walked right into one, which is why debunkers must NEVER
EVER be shown the facts, they would become suicidal. Point in fact,
many debunkers have killed themselves when presented with the
evidence. We must NOT allow that to happen again.

Mike Combs wrote:
> "Hagar" sahm.name> wrote in message
> news:J92dnUj5COdDOGbanZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>> Come back when you can show us a hubcap or a muffler that fell off an UFO...
Show full article (1.52Kb)
no comments
Re: UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!         


Author: Hagar
Date: Apr 9, 2008 06:31

Typical cop-our reply from a brain washed UFO screwball.
Keep up the insanity, LipFlapper, the guys in the white coats and nets are
on their way ..
You can have the cell next to Ed Conrad.

"Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA" zzz.com> wrote in message
news:fbe564f7-f95a-4a4f-b686-07fff9e52ef9@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> Been there, done that. Debunkers wouldn't know the side...
Show full article (1.92Kb)
no comments
Re: UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!         


Author: Hagar
Date: Apr 9, 2008 06:32

Loon ...
Show full article (0.74Kb)
no comments
Re: UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!         


Author: Sir Arthur CB Wholeflaffers ASA
Date: Apr 9, 2008 14:06

Hagor, As a debunker, you are less then worthless, and I DID predict
when the official UFO cover-up has ended, which it has, all that would
be left are total morons, such as yourself. I know you feel defeated,
beaten-up and useless, and you indeed are, but there is still hope.
Perhaps 10 years in a loony bin may help you; it has helped other
debunkers to become useful members of society, although most debunkers
have killed themselves, and rightfully so!!

As one of the last remaining debunkers on these groups and in the
country, you could at least feel that you fooled yourself, and perhaps
that will give you strength in your moment of need. Good luck and God
speed, and may the Lord have mercy on your soul because the Devil
does not want it!!

Please don't throw things at Hagor, he is on the brink of despair!!

Sir Artio

Hagar wrote:
> Typical cop-our reply from a brain washed UFO screwball.
> Keep up the insanity, LipFlapper, the guys in the white coats and nets are
> on their way ..
> You can have the cell next to Ed...
Show full article (2.59Kb)
no comments
Re: UFO Debunkers: A Dangerous "Cult" or Super Patriots?/ The History of UFO Debunking!         


Author: Bob Casanova
Date: Apr 9, 2008 18:48

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 22:27:41 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Sir Arthur CB
Wholeflaffers ASA zzz.com>:
>Demonstrably wrong, not even old-time debunkers use that tired
>technique anymore. How sad you must be :,<

Well, that's one way to say "There is none" using excessive
verbiage. If you disagree, please post the location of the
physical evidence. Note: fuzzy videos and still photos don't
count as "physical evidence". Alien bodies or pieces of
alien spacecraft, or alien artifacts, would be somewhat more
persuasive than some moron saying "demonstrably wrong"
without the associated demonstration.

And why should I be sad, since I don't particularly care if
you embrace looniness?
Show full article (1.33Kb)
51 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9