|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: RaistRaist Date: Nov 15, 2007 02:48
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
Pretty good job - I'll pick #1 as the original. Toggling between the two, the
second looks a little flat and - well, for lack of any specifiv technical things
to point out, it seemed a bit odd. Maybe something to do with the proportions?
> Oh, and extra points if you can say whose image it is that I
> photoshopped onto the original.
No idea.
R.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Onideus Mad HatterOnideus Mad Hatter Date: Nov 15, 2007 02:59
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:48:25 -1000, Raist wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>
>Pretty good job - I'll pick #1 as the original. Toggling between the two, the
>second looks a little flat and - well, for lack of any specifiv technical things
>to point out, it seemed a bit odd. Maybe something to do with the proportions?
^___^
--
|
| Show full article (3.43Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: makmak Date: Nov 15, 2007 03:06
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
this is the original
btw, like the noose being prepared on the tree in the back...
M
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Onideus Mad HatterOnideus Mad Hatter Date: Nov 15, 2007 03:13
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:06:13 +0100, mak nospam.com> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>
>this is the original
Are you positive? ^___^
>btw, like the noose being prepared on the tree in the back...
|
| Show full article (3.04Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: makmak Date: Nov 15, 2007 23:35
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
i knew it, the skin tone was a *little* to shiny in the fake, and the reflection in the eyes in the original
just fit the rest of the lighting.
good job though...
M
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: RaistRaist Date: Nov 16, 2007 03:12
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
Eh - ya got me.I was about 75%% sure of the other one... and wrong. Well, I'm not
a graphics guy. If it was detecting autotune on vocals, I'm the shit!
R.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|