Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.airports.uk.edinburgh only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.airports.uk.edinburgh Profile…
 Up
Re: Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007         


Author: Joe Curry
Date: Aug 30, 2008 19:03

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:54:16 +0100, "Clive"
nospamorange.net> wrote:
>>The the CC forcing BAA to sell an airport in Scotland would be an
>>unmitigated disaster for the travelling public - whom were supposed to be
>>going to be advantaged by the ruling - not disadvantaged.
>If what B says did happen, and I think it could, how would they be
>disadvantaged Jim?

But PIK's pax being poached isn't going to happen..dream on Clive?
>Those disadvantaged are those closer to PIK but they are a small
>minority of the total, I reckon, and inbound visitors will nearly all arrive
>closer to where they are going.

Edinburgh? I would assume they would prefer to fly into EDI direct?
--

EDINBURGH - It's a kinda magic!
http://www.edinburgh-inspiringcapital.com
Edinburgh International Surface Link
www.eisl.org.uk
5 Comments
Re: Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007         


Author: Joe Curry
Date: Aug 30, 2008 19:05

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:56:00 +0100, "Clive"
nospamorange.net> wrote:
>> Dont trust joes figures,
>No one does. I don't think many people read them either.

Looks like you are missing geniune figures sourced CAA?

Or do you prefer speculative figures involving PIK's demise?
--

EDINBURGH - It's a kinda magic!
http://www.edinburgh-inspiringcapital.com
Edinburgh International Surface Link
www.eisl.org.uk
no comments
Re: Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007         


Author: Joe Curry
Date: Aug 30, 2008 19:06

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:20:47 +0100, Jim Mason
removethisukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>> If what B says did happen, and I think it could, how would they be
>> disadvantaged Jim?
>
>Lack of competition from PIK will maybe mean a slightly nearer airport

Slightly nearer to what? A lot of guys in here assume pax flying to
PIK are visiting Glasgow..nothing could be further than the truth.
--

EDINBURGH - It's a kinda magic!
http://www.edinburgh-inspiringcapital.com
Edinburgh International Surface Link
www.eisl.org.uk
no comments
Re: Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007         


Author: B
Date: Aug 30, 2008 19:19

On Aug 30, 4:54 pm, "Clive" nospamorange.net> wrote:
> "Jim Mason" removethisukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:MPG.232372797506c92f9899d0@news.individual.net...
> In article <7216914c-4adf-497b-9624-
> 909fda775...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, blim...@btopenworld.com says...
>
>
>
>>> Just say, for talking's sake, that GLA's new operator enticed all
>>> PIK's pax carriers to GLA
>>The the CC forcing BAA to sell an airport in Scotland would be an
>>unmitigated disaster for the travelling public - whom were supposed to be
>>going to be advantaged by the ruling - not disadvantaged.
>
> If what B says did happen, and I think it could, how would they be
> disadvantaged Jim? Surely the bulk of GLA and PIK's combined market would be
> that bit more handy to GLA than they are to PIK? And fares wouldn't
> necessarily go up (beyond what they will anyway)  because Ryanair being at
> GLA will keep GLA's fares in check that bit more than they already do, ...
Show full article (1.29Kb)
no comments
Re: Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007         


Author: bytheway
Date: Aug 30, 2008 19:36

On Aug 30, 6:06 pm, Joe Curry googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:20:47 +0100, Jim Mason
>
> removethisukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>>> If what B says did happen, and I think it could, how would they be
>>> disadvantaged Jim?
>
>>Lack of competition from PIK will maybe mean a slightly nearer airport
>
> Slightly nearer to what? A lot of guys in here assume pax flying to
> PIK are visiting Glasgow..nothing could be further than the truth.
> --
>
A significant number of them are, including the many that board a
train there and alight at Glasgow Central Station, and including
thousands of Glasgow residents - myself included - that use the
airport. So while not all PIK passengers are Glasgow-bound, please
explain how "nothing could be further from the truth" than pax...
Show full article (0.84Kb)
no comments
Re: Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007         


Author: BillyBrownStuff
Date: Aug 30, 2008 19:56

On 30 Aug, 18:06, Joe Curry googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:20:47 +0100, Jim Mason
>
> removethisukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>>> If what B says did happen, and I think it could, how would they be
>>> disadvantaged Jim?
>
>>Lack of competition from PIK will maybe mean a slightly nearer airport
>
> Slightly nearer to what? A lot of guys in here assume pax flying to
> PIK are visiting Glasgow..nothing could be further than the truth.
And you'll be along shortly with a link for that statement I
presume....?
no comments
Re: Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007         


Author: B
Date: Aug 30, 2008 20:08

On Aug 30, 4:16 pm, Allygla live.co.uk> wrote:
> Dont trust joes figures, Just found joe on another site as reads ----
>
> Oh look - Joe had post #18 removed!

What site?
no comments
Re: Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007         


Author: Clive
Date: Aug 30, 2008 20:26

"Jim Mason" removethisukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.232383bc6e0c37929899d1@news.individual.net...
>
> Lack of competition from PIK will maybe mean a slightly nearer airport but
> I couldn't see anything but higher overall fares for the public - but
> besides that lack of choice is never a good thing IMHO.

In the scenario outlined the choice would be exactly the same only handier
for most. All the Ryanair and Wizz Air PIK flights would go from GLA. Apart
from all that the new owners at GLA will be able to attract all sorts of new
international links by offering lower charges so choice will be greater than
it is now. I certainly don't see the status quo being a better option for
west of Scotland traveller or visitors to here and neither do the CC. I
couldn't be more delighted that change is on the horizon.
>Personally I am
> more than happy with the situation we have at the moment where there IS
> choice and I am sure those who live nearer to PIK than they do GLA or EDI
> might agree.

They would, of course, if PIK has the destination they need to get to but
their numbers are comparatively small.
Show full article (2.04Kb)
no comments
Re: Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007         


Author: Joe Curry
Date: Aug 30, 2008 21:18

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:19:59 -0700 (PDT), B btopenworld.com>
wrote:
>My GLA/PIK Masterplan would be the ideal scenario of course ;-) The OP
>being decidedly nervous about it it seems.

Positively shaking... but it would appear you are the nervous one
given the CAA figures?

--

EDINBURGH - It's a kinda magic!
http://www.edinburgh-inspiringcapital.com
Edinburgh International Surface Link
www.eisl.org.uk
no comments
Re: Scotland's top 5 airports by passenger volume, 2000 and 2007         


Author: Joe Curry
Date: Aug 30, 2008 21:20

On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:36:14 -0700 (PDT), bytheway
yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> Slightly nearer to what? A lot of guys in here assume pax flying to
>> PIK are visiting Glasgow..nothing could be further than the truth.
>A significant number of them are, including the many that board a
>train there and alight at Glasgow Central Station, and including
>thousands of Glasgow residents - myself included - that use the
>airport. So while not all PIK passengers are Glasgow-bound, please
>explain how "nothing could be further from the truth" than pax flying
>into PIK visiting Glasgow.

You answered your own question Alan... btw those alighting at Glasgow
Central are dispersing throughout Scotland? They are not all headed
for Glasgow
--

EDINBURGH - It's a kinda magic!
http://www.edinburgh-inspiringcapital.com
Edinburgh International Surface Link
www.eisl.org.uk
no comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9