On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:45:45 -0700, Mack A. Damia
hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:23:17 -0700, Mack A. Damia
>
hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 20:09:58 +0100, "Harry Keane"
>>
blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> LaJean Lawson, a former professor of exercise science at Oregon State
>>>> University, has studied breast motion since 1985
>>>
>>>
>>>Hah! That's nothing! I've studied breast motion since 1959.
>>
>>Good man!
>>
>>Evolutionarily speaking, the female breast was not designed for
>>suckling infants; rather, it is theorized that the grand design was
>>for the sexual attraction of the male after we descended from the
>>trees, realized out private parts and buttocks were exposed, and
>>covered them.
>
>Incidentally, this is a theory that I'm currently developing: the
>reconciliation of Genesis with evolution.
>
>Eons ago there were no historians - only one man in a tribe who would
>pass on *history* to another, younger member of the tribe who would
>eventually pass the story on to yet another younger member of the
>tribe.
>
>This went on for thousands of years.
>
>Ever play that game where you whisper a story to someone at a party
>and the story is whispered around the room until the last person
>reveals what he/she has heard. It's always quite different from the
>original story.
>
>Moses came along and wrote Genesis - based on these stories.
'Course, Moses decided along with his cabal that one god was better
than a whole bunch of gods.
It stopped all the arguments that "my god is better than your god".
See, in the bicameral mind, everybody had their own god who spoke to
his/her other side, and there was a lot of discord.
You know, some day I hope to be surprised by a flash of intellect from
one of you. I'm still waiting.
--
mad
