>
> "mudz" none.com> wrote in message
> news:2008082422384316807-none@nonecom...

> Try Newfoundland.

> On 2008-08-25 15:41:56 -0600, "LilPeach" <{lilpeach}@zhonka.net> said:
>

>>
>> "mudz" none.com> wrote in message
>> news:2008082422384316807-none@nonecom...

>
>

>> Try Newfoundland.

>
> A good idea, and a place I'd like to see...but too far, with too much
> of nothing along the way. Driving across Saskatchewan can kill a
> normal person...and if I survived that I'd still have to deal with
> Quebec....(shudder)

> ttosbt wrote:

>> On 2008-08-25 15:41:56 -0600, "LilPeach" <{lilpeach}@zhonka.net> said:
>>

>>>
>>> "mudz" none.com> wrote in message
>>> news:2008082422384316807-none@nonecom...

>>
>>

>>> Try Newfoundland.

>>
>> A good idea, and a place I'd like to see...but too far, with too much
>> of nothing along the way. Driving across Saskatchewan can kill a
>> normal person...and if I survived that I'd still have to deal with
>> Quebec....(shudder)

>
> This then?
>
> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/travel/2008132213_troregoncoast24.html