On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:55:50 +0000 (UTC), Pat Burke tried dazzling the
audience with the following episode
> walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.ceap wrote in
> news:fcjnts$thc$1@news.datemas.de:
>
>> In
, on 09/16/07
>> at 04:06 PM, Pat Burke gsdhjasfds.net.de> said:
>> >>>walksalone
nerdshack.com> wrote in
>>>news:Xns99AD6A245C614walks@85.114.133.75: >>
>>>> Pat Burke
gsdhjasfds.net.de>
>>>> news:Xns99ADBB49053DEburkegsdhjasfdsnetde@207.14.116.130 felt a deep
>>>> burning, desire to assist his new friend, or so, would appear.
>>>> >>>>> walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.ceap wrote in
>>>>> news:fcja7p$ba2$1@news.datemas.de:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In <5bape3hbc820h836o5bcpdbo5efm93lnbe@
4ax.com>, on 09/15/07
>>>>>> at 08:56 PM, john w
@yahoo.com> said:>>>>
>>>> snip
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:48:25 -0400, NOspam@no.spam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> В© 2007 John D Weatherly
>>>> snip
>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:44:45 -0700, john w
>>>>>>>>>>
@yahoo.com> >>
>> snip
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure I care for your tone.
>>>>
>>>> You all will forgive me, I'm sure, but he forgot to ask if I cared.
>>>> I do not.
>>
>>>Forgiveness is dispensed by a priest in confession, not by the
>>>unctious
>>> snivellers you lord it over in arcb.
>>
>> Maybe for you, the way I was raised, humans forgave each other. Are
>> you done posturing yet?
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>> Sanctimonious and arrogant are hardly qualities one would expect in
>>>>> a devout Baptist.
>>>>
>>>> Did you just call me a Baptist, or are you pretending to know who or
>>>> what I am.
>>
>>
>>>Hmmm....why don't we start off assuming you're an illterate buffoon
>>>and watch you spiral down from there.
>>
>> Because that would require me to be related to you, and I'm happy to
>> say that even though daddy got around, he knew where all his spare
>> little bastards were. You never made his list.
>>
>>>> I suspect in your ignorance, you haven't a clue, &
>>>> possibly our trying to establish yourself as a person with an
>>>> opinion worth listening to. So far, you are not. The likelihood
>>>> does not seem to be to favorable for change in that general
>>>> impression.
>>
>>
>>>Favorable likelihood? You're trying to express concepts beyond your
>>>grasp of basic grammar. It's unfortunate your verbal skills don't
>>>stack
>>> up to your oversized ego.
>>
>> In other words, all you can do is attempt to browbeat, look down your
>> nose, curl your upper lip, and fall over while try to cock a leg. jw
>> already has a grip on that particular act. If this particular posting
>> is indicated of your verbal skills and general knowledge, then it's
>> apparent. You are certainly in the wrong area of life.
>
>
> The key to incisive debate is coherence. I defy the reader to decipher
> the jumbled metaphors and lousy syntax above.The more you proclaim
> yourself an authority on anything, the more ridiculous you appear. Your
> inability to decline a verb isn't exactly indicative of major brain
> power.
>
>
>
>> The enchanted Kingdom is not here, even if jw, and now you, is. The
>> group already has an individual that you are trying to emulate, which
>> makes you, redundant. But then, that's a situation, you probably find
>> yourself in, quite frequently.
>
>
> Are. More than one person in this context uses third person plural. Why
> must I wade through your stuttering to try to discern if there is
> actually a point in there?
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>> As an aside, I've monitored this group and participated in this
>>>> group since 1995, and with the exception of jw, most of the ass
>>>> holes leave in short order. And then there's the other variety. It
>>>> hangs around, because it has nothing better to do than pretend to be
>>>> better than others. It's incapable of conversation, it's incapable
>>>> of discussion.
>>
>>>Have no fear, snake handler, I'll engage. As you limp bloodied and
>>
>> Fear, and emotion I have recognized in the past. Considering the
>> circumstances, I would consider it good sense on my part.
>
>
> No doubt. A healthy respect for the snake is wise under the
> circumstances.
>
>
>>
>>>bruised after our joust, you won't be complaining of a lack of
>>>discussion.
>>
>> Of course I will, so far, all you can try to play, the educated
>> intellectual snob, who in reality only fools himself. A role I'm sure
>> you are capable of playing well.
>
>
> If clarity of thought is of any reckoning here, you're being clobbered
> about 61-0.
>
>
>>
>>>> Which one of these two categories you will fall in has yet to be
>>>> determined, no doubt you will provide sufficient evidence for
>>>> everybody to determine which one you are for themselves.
>>>> Good luck on a speedy determination, I already have my suspicion.
>>>> I suspect that George Jones, among others, has sang a song dedicated
>>>> to people like you and Johnny.
>>
>>>Probably Toby Keith. However I understand Georgie dedicated "High Tech
>>>Redneck" to our favorite tent revival hick with a Dell.
>>
>> No, it was George. The title song, the assholes song. You might
>> recognize this line from it. I told your mother
>> you were an asshole
>> she said
>> you know, I think you're right
>> but either way, an asshole tonight.
>
>
> How drole. That certainly raises the tone of the debate. If I'm
> exhausting you mentally, feel free to cut and paste "why don't we get
> drunk and screw" as your next attempt at burlesque.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>>> I believe I'm going to have to take you down a peg or two.
>>
>>>> I don't think you will, as matter of fact, I know you will not.
>>
>>>The audience decides here, WA. As you're slapped around eight ways to
>>
>> No, it does not. Odd as s that may sound, you, trying to use the
>> audience to support your position is known as a logical fallacy, which
>> one I will leave it to your imagination. It has to do with numbers
>> and flies, the latter on sure you are familiar with the former may be
>> beyond your experience.
>
>
> Oh, and if you have indeed been around since 95, one would have hoped
> you had learned to locate the rewrap button. Make an effort to tidy it
> up, there's a good chap.
>
>
>
>>
>>>Sunday, I've a feeling many here will enjoy the flaying of your
>>>pompous
>>> ass. Just my opinion, of course.
>>
>> You're entitled to your opinion, what you are not entitled do you is
>> pretend that everybody agrees with you automatically. In the first
>> place, it's apparent all you are going to be able to do is attempt to
>> verbally abuse others. Child, I've had my ass chewed by
>> professionals, people that knew more than I did, and respectable
>> individuals. You're not qualified.
>
>
> It appears your major wasn't logic. Do you read what you post, or just
> assume that sheer volume somehow disguises your poorly conceived ideas?
> Try to maintain a train of thought that actually goes somewhere.
>
>
>>
>>>> You have a major problem on your hands, you are going to attempt to
>>>> engage somebody who knows more about your mythology, than you'd ever
>>>> want to encounter.
>>
>>>You underestimate the rigours of a Jesuit education, obscure saints a
>>
>> No, I do not. If there was ever a group were serious about the
>> mythology, they would qualify. Met a few of them, interesting people.
>> Some made me think, and I made others think. So I considered it to be
>> mutually worthwhile. Something you are failing to establish as of
>> yet.
>>
>>>specialty.
>>
>> History, anthropology, as well as sociology as applied to the myths of
>> the ancient near East, and by the way, technically speaking. There
>> are no xian saints. I'll leave that to you as an exercise in futility.
>> If you try to figure it out you will have to do some serious reading.
>
>
>
> Please tell me you're not that dim. Saints are a Catholic belief, not
> common to all of Christianity. Your canned summary of the evolution of
> Catholicism reflects your shallowness of thought and comfort with the
> least challenging explanation.
>
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>>>> Pat
>>>>
>>>> walksalone who is not certain why this particular individual has
>>>> dropped by to grace the group would his presence, other than like,
>>>> Johnny, he can. Hopefully, the group will kill file any bullshit
>>>> that follows his declaration. He may be as prolific as Johnny, he
>>>> may be as vapid & inane as Johnny, only time will tell. In any
>>>> event, let the Bulls began for at least two days to see if it's
>>>> worth the effort to respond to this particular individual.
>>
>>>And the killfile clarion is sounded to the unwashed masses!! Since
>>
>> Actually, if I place you in the kill file, the only will you will know
>> it by the lack of response to you from me. I don't pretend to have
>> one I can turn on and off at will. Mine is set to expire in 9999
>> days.
>
> And you think I care about killfile expirations why exactly? Perhaps you
> would be better served with a newsreader with more manageable filtering
> and a format tool.
>
>
>>
>>>you've been around since 95, you're aware that "I didn't reply because
>>>Burke is killfiled" just ain't going to fly.
>>
>> Oh but it will, the regulars on this group know, I don't bullshit
>> around. If I say, I will do something, it is done. You might ask
>> somebody besides, your new suck, buddy. I probably, depending on
>> which newsreader I use, won't even see any responses that has your
>> name within the message.
>>
>>>You'll fold, and you'll fold early.
>>
>> Sure, I will Poncho, in your wildest dreams.
>
>
> Poncho? Try to keep your ethnic slurs at least somewhat pertinent to
> the insultee.
Poncho, Don Quixote. No surprise that you would miss the reference.
>> There is another clown, who is still here, that was under the same
>> impression. Stand up and take a bow jw.
>>
>>>Pat
>>
>> yourself on the back?
>>
>> You have one message left to convince me you are worth the effort to
>> engage in conversation. By the way, your technique needs polishing,
>> report to Vernon O for advice. He is a resident of my kill file, and
>> has been for quite some time. A combination of verbosity, ignorance,
>> and repeating himself when he had nothing to say what nothing to back
>> up his claims. I'm sure you too will get along fabulously. He likes
>> to pretend he also is intellectually superior to others. That's three
>> in the group as of right now counting you.
>
>
> I have one message left to convince you? Do you have any idea who
If that is what the man said, that is what he meant. Never saw him going
for posturing, like you are doing.
> pathetic that sounds? Your over-inflated opinion of yourself comes off
> as compensation for some deeper insecurities, WA.
Hum, do you think just because you play pompous ass on usenet, that makes
you a person of insight. Last I heard, that man makes a mountain look like
its, well like you, a shifty individual.
BTW, what's with this wa act, are you trying to impress everyone, or just
yourself?
> I know Vernon. I cleaned his clock a few years back, believe he still
> walks with a limp.
You sucked his ass that hard, or are claiming to have sucked it that hard?
All anyone has seen from you is high winds.
> Pat
I see you trimmed the headers, were you concerned that some of those that
know you best might join in?
Galla [not the lady galia in case you have a hard time reading names.]
