Pat Burke wrote:
> walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.ceap wrote in
> news:fcjnts$thc$1@news.datemas.de:
>
>> In
, on
>> 09/16/07 at 04:06 PM, Pat Burke gsdhjasfds.net.de> said:
>> >>>walksalone
nerdshack.com> wrote in
>>> news:Xns99AD6A245C614walks@85.114.133.75: >>
>>>> Pat Burke
gsdhjasfds.net.de>
>>>> news:Xns99ADBB49053DEburkegsdhjasfdsnetde@207.14.116.130 felt a> deep >>> burning, desire to assist his new friend, or so, would
> appear. >>>
>>>>> walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.ceap wrote in
>>>>> news:fcja7p$ba2$1@news.datemas.de:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In <5bape3hbc820h836o5bcpdbo5efm93lnbe@
4ax.com>, on 09/15/07
>>>>>> at 08:56 PM, john w
@yahoo.com> said:>>>>
>>>> snip
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:48:25 -0400, NOspam@no.spam
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ) 2007 John D Weatherly
>>>> snip
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:44:45 -0700, john w
>>>>>>>>>>
@yahoo.com>
snip
>> In other words, all you can do is attempt to browbeat, look down
>> your nose, curl your upper lip, and fall over while try to cock a
>> leg. jw already has a grip on that particular act. If this
>> particular posting is indicated of your verbal skills and general
>> knowledge, then it's apparent. You are certainly in the wrong area
>> of life.
>
>
> The key to incisive debate is coherence. I defy the reader to decipher
And the ability to bring, subject to the table for discussion. An
ability you have not demonstrated as far as I can tell. Or is your
posturing, what want you want to discuss. I believe that somebody
named Weatherly is the expert on that subject in this group.
> the jumbled metaphors and lousy syntax above.The more you proclaim
> yourself an authority on anything, the more ridiculous you appear.
I don't believe the other person has bothered to claim to be an
authority on anything, though I will admit, it appears you are anamp or
authority on running your mouth and saying nothing.
> Your inability to decline a verb isn't exactly indicative of major
> brain power.
& your inability to do anything but attempt to engage in
spelling/grammar flames is indicate if of you having nothing to say,
but you don't mind posturing anyway. If you want to engage the man in
debate, and I suspect that by now you are to kill filed, then pick a
subject and ask him would he care to join you in discussing it.
As a sidenote, when I visited him last week, he's using an AVR system,
and I doubt if he would bother to proofreadanything that is being
posted to someone who apparently is only interested in posturing. He
had a student like that that lasted one week, we never saw that boy in
that area again.
When all the hot air was that out of him, he was no bigger than you
will be wants somebody lets the hot air out of you.
>> The enchanted Kingdom is not here, even if jw, and now you, is. The
>> group already has an individual that you are trying to emulate,
>> which makes you, redundant. But then, that's a situation, you
>> probably find yourself in, quite frequently.
>
>
> Are. More than one person in this context uses third person plural.
In other words,you are already taking refuge in attempting to poison
the well against the other person by engaging in spelling/grammar
flames. Thereby, attending it not worthy to be talked to, and
therefore you must be one heck of a swell guy. Swollen head, maybe so.
> Why must I wade through your stuttering to try to discern if there is
> actually a point in there?
What's the matter, like JW, you can only take your English one way
because any other way leaves you in a state of confusion. Does it
really take that much to confuse you? Or have you failed to notice,
you yet to bring, subject to the table for discussion.
If you're such a hot shot, you should be able to discuss the following
with ease.
The Abrahamic/patriarch myths, along with any supporting evidence, up
to and including the sojourn in Egypt.
Which god was it that brought them out of Egypt, el or ba'al?
what is the significance of the burning bush that supposedly startled
Moses.
What is the significance of the 10 plagues and why it was a important
to the creation mythology of the Hebrews.
What archaeological support is there for the exodus claim.
when was the United Kingdom really in existence, if ever, and what
supporting archaeological evidence is, there for it.
what is the significance of the cylinder seal prior to the middle iron
age.
what is the significance of the stables at Meggido in relation to King
Solomon.
How many of the city's named, in Israel, existed prior to or during the
claimed reign of David of Judea.
What is the iconography of the early bronze through the early iron age,
and why does it disprove a monotheistic Judea, until, at the earliest
the middle iron age.
I, and the remainder of the audience, have seen you forward no such
items for discussion. Do the chicken strut, yes, that has been
noticed, which is hardly the same as having either a discussion or a
debate.
>>>> As an aside, I've monitored this group and participated in this
>>>> group since 1995, and with the exception of jw, most of the ass
Damn old man, are you trying to make me feel old?
>>>> holes leave in short order. And then there's the other variety.
> It >>> hangs around, because it has nothing better to do than pretend
> to be >>> better than others. It's incapable of conversation, it's
> incapable >>> of discussion.
>>
>>> Have no fear, snake handler, I'll engage. As you limp bloodied and
>>
>> Fear, and emotion I have recognized in the past. Considering the
>> circumstances, I would consider it good sense on my part.
>
>
> No doubt. A healthy respect for the snake is wise under the
> circumstances.
I believe he was talking about Vietnam, and he does not much worry over
dead worms that pretend to be garden snakes. Snakes don't bother the
man, very few things do beyond injustice and attempting to denigrate
others, others, you do not know.
>>> bruised after our joust, you won't be complaining of a lack of
>>> discussion.
>> Of course I will, so far, all you can try to play, the educated
>> intellectual snob, who in reality only fools himself. A role I'm
>> sure you are capable of playing well.
> If clarity of thought is of any reckoning here, you're being clobbered
> about 61-0.
How odd, for you to mention that, you have shown no thinking as of yet.
Childish attempts at putdowns, yes, thinking, no
>>>> Which one of these two categories you will fall in has yet to be
>>>> determined, no doubt you will provide sufficient evidence for
>>>> everybody to determine which one you are for themselves.
>>>> Good luck on a speedy determination, I already have my suspicion.
>>>> I suspect that George Jones, among others, has sang a song
> dedicated >>> to people like you and Johnny.
>>
>>> Probably Toby Keith. However I understand Georgie dedicated "High
>>> Tech Redneck" to our favorite tent revival hick with a Dell.
>>
>> No, it was George. The title song, the assholes song. You might
>> recognize this line from it. I told your mother
>> you were an asshole
>> she said
>> you know, I think you're right
>> but either way, an asshole tonight.
>
>
> How drole. That certainly raises the tone of the debate. If I'm
> exhausting you mentally, feel free to cut and paste "why don't we get
> drunk and screw" as your next attempt at burlesque.
How accurate. By the way, when are you goingto start a debate or you
simply going to talk to yourself and about yourself. The subject may
fascinate you, but it's rather boring to everybody else.
>>
>>>>> I believe I'm going to have to take you down a peg or two.
>>
>>>> I don't think you will, as matter of fact, I know you will not.
>>
>>> The audience decides here, WA. As you're slapped around eight
>>> ways to
>>
>> No, it does not. Odd as s that may sound, you, trying to use the
>> audience to support your position is known as a logical fallacy,
>> which one I will leave it to your imagination. It has to do with
>> numbers and flies, the latter on sure you are familiar with the
>> former may be beyond your experience.
>
>
> Oh, and if you have indeed been around since 95, one would have hoped
> you had learned to locate the rewrap button. Make an effort to tidy it
> up, there's a good chap.
I suspect by now, you already in the killfile. Yet you will squeal
like a stuck hog, trot around as if you'd done something, and
accomplish nothing. From the looks of it, a lot like the individual
you came over here to help. Of course, you could be wrong.
>>> Sunday, I've a feeling many here will enjoy the flaying of your
>>> pompous
>>> ass. Just my opinion, of course.
>>
>> You're entitled to your opinion, what you are not entitled do you is
>> pretend that everybody agrees with you automatically. In the first
>> place, it's apparent all you are going to be able to do is attempt
>> to verbally abuse others. Child, I've had my ass chewed by
>> professionals, people that knew more than I did, and respectable
>> individuals. You're not qualified.
>
>
> It appears your major wasn't logic. Do you read what you post, or just
Usually, he does not bother to proof read responses that don't matter,
such as to individuals like yourself and your new buddy.
> assume that sheer volume somehow disguises your poorly conceived
> ideas? Try to maintain a train of thought that actually goes
> somewhere.
Why don't you try to start a train of thought. Instead of simply
whining about not being able to understand what's going on. And
therefore it must be the fault of anybody else but yourself.
snip remnant of attention posturing by the new clown of the Baptist
group.
Hel
