In article <60g3onF1q5r1rU1@mid.individual.net> Dr John Watson <drjohn@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com> writes: There was some research published recently that showed only 3%% of people decided not to use an illegal drug *because* it's illegal, meaning prohibition is 97%% ineffective as a deterrent. Unfortunately, I forgot to bookmark it and I need it for an article. Google is less than helpful, so
Young people live longer than old ones - just another stupid statistic. OF COURSE injections are going down. The clinic ones are not deemed illegal ones. -- John the West Ham fan housetrained@hotmail.com <>< "Dr John Watson" <drjohn@NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com> wrote in message news:5qd38vFvb8piU1@mid.individual.net... I'll bet the Daily Moral and the NDPA ($cientology division) will choke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 BBC "Drug Scourge Takes Hold in Argentina' Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn't Fit [Odd timing. Assume ther is some political motivation behind this story, since street drug use statistics are notoriously unreiabel, as even this article admits. When a "drug scourge" is described as needing "urgent action," assume
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 BBC "Drug Scourge Takes Hold in Argentina' Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn't Fit [Odd timing. Assume ther is some political motivation behind this story, since street drug use statistics are notoriously unreiabel, as even this article admits. When a "drug scourge" is described as needing "urgent action," assume
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 BBC "Drug Scourge Takes Hold in Argentina' Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn't Fit [Odd timing. Assume ther is some political motivation behind this story, since street drug use statistics are notoriously unreiabel, as even this article admits. When a "drug scourge" is described as needing "urgent action," assume
