On Jun 8, 9:49 am, IAAH <n...@email.exist> wrote: Jahnu wrote: Hey retard, explain how it is not an infinitely greater leap of faith to believe that world created itself No scientist believes that, Derp-king. You don't even know what scientists believe, bozo. Get an education. "The record certainly did not reveal gradual transformations of structure in the course of time
On Jun 8, 5:29 am, Virgil <Vir...@home.esc> wrote: <bla Who gives a shit about falsifying? Only retards care about falsifying, as if it proves anything. "Undeniably, the fossil record has provided disappointingly few gradual series. The origins of many groups are still not documented at all." (Futuyma, D., Science on Trial: The Case for Evolution) "There is still a tremendous problem
On Jun 1, 12:16 am, Christopher A. Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 18:56:16 -0400, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 15:06:13 -0700 (PDT), Sound of Trumpet <soundoftrum...@dcemail.com> wrote: The Moral Collapse Brought About by Darwinism You know that you're quoting a fundamentalist Muslim who would consider *you*
On 1 June, 11:21, James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> wrote: The politically correct version of Darwin, the post 1972 version, has practically nothing left. They had to credit him with common descent to explain what he is famous for. When Darwin is shrunk to what is politically correct, there is very little left. Darwin not only stomps all over political
On Mon, 31 May 2010 15:06:13 -0700, Sound of Trumpet wrote: The Moral Collapse Brought About by Darwinism .. as opposed to corrupted churches? Religion is treated here as a unified monolithic force. It is not as Darwin is not. If you reject God and replace Him with another belief that... .. the rest can only be an iffy straw man. An assumption of what others may believe or reject
