curious about 8 byte LOGICAL
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 51 articles for 0.008 sec
Re: curious about 8 byte LOGICAL...     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for curious about 8 byte LOGICAL in comp.lang.fortran
Author: Charles Coldwell
Date: Apr 23, 2008 15:45

... What applications are there for 8 byte LOGICAL types? (Or for 2 byte ... the default size is often 4 bytes for likely performance reasons (register loads ...data, but if space is an issue, why pack logicals into two bytes and not one? Just curious... My guess would be for alignment. Some... memory you'll get higher performance logicals? Chip -- Charles M. "Chip" Coldwell "Turn...
Show full article (0.89Kb) · Show article thread
Re: curious about 8 byte LOGICAL...     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for curious about 8 byte LOGICAL in comp.lang.fortran
Author: Ian Bush
Date: Apr 23, 2008 04:15

...> types:  1 byte, 2 byte 4 byte...and 8 byte? What applications are there for 8 byte LOGICAL types?  (Or for 2 byte types?) Storage association rules require than a...the same space as a default LOGICAL.  N1601.pdf, section 16.4.3...to specify (portably) the smallest available logical type, for instances where I do... over quite so well to logicals, where there are always only ...
Show full article (1.24Kb) · Show article thread
Re: curious about 8 byte LOGICAL...     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for curious about 8 byte LOGICAL in comp.lang.fortran
Author: Horand.Gassmann
Date: Apr 23, 2008 03:58

... Quite a few compilers support different representations for LOGICAL types:  1 byte, 2... What applications are there for 8 byte LOGICAL types?  (Or for 2 byte types?) Storage association rules require than a default ... the same space as a default LOGICAL.  N1601.pdf, section 16.4.3.1:... me to specify (portably) the smallest available logical type, for instances where I do not ...
Show full article (0.81Kb) · Show article thread
Re: curious about 8 byte LOGICAL...     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for curious about 8 byte LOGICAL in comp.lang.fortran
Author: e p chandler
Date: Apr 22, 2008 21:01

... applications are there for 8 byte LOGICAL types?  (Or for 2 ...same space as a default LOGICAL.  N1601.pdf, section 16.4...integer, default real, or default logical occupies a single numeric storage...to be bigger than 4 byte INTEGERs permits, and it's...throughout to update everything to 8 byte INTEGERs, although f03 provide...are storage associated with default LOGICALs.  Of course the big problem...
Show full article (2.15Kb) · Show article thread
Re: curious about 8 byte LOGICAL...     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for curious about 8 byte LOGICAL in comp.lang.fortran
Author: James Van Buskirk
Date: Apr 22, 2008 18:15

...What applications are there for 8 byte LOGICAL types? (Or for 2 byte types?) Storage association rules require than a... same space as a default LOGICAL. N1601.pdf, section 16.4.3... integer, default real, or default logical occupies a single numeric storage ... to be bigger than 4 byte INTEGERs permits, and it's ... are storage associated with default LOGICALs. Of course the big problem ...
Show full article (2.38Kb) · Show article thread
curious about 8 byte LOGICAL...     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for curious about 8 byte LOGICAL in comp.lang.fortran
Author: andrej.panjkov
Date: Apr 22, 2008 16:28

Quite a few compilers support different representations for LOGICAL types: 1 byte, 2 ... byte? What applications are there for 8 byte LOGICAL types? (Or for 2 byte types?) ...understand that the default size is often 4 bytes for likely performance reasons (register loads and ... packing data, but if space is an issue, why pack logicals into two bytes and not one? Just curious... Andrej
Show full article (0.47Kb)
Re: curious about 8 byte LOGICAL...     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for curious about 8 byte LOGICAL in comp.lang.fortran
Author: robert.corbett
Date: Apr 24, 2008 01:53

... be much less important for subscript values. For four byte integer and eight byte real, you can address 8GB and 16GB respectively with a signed 32...? That the default integer isn't 8 bytes, or that no integer is eight bytes. The problem is that the default ...is not 64 bits. Sun Fortran supports 8-byte signed and unsigned integers. I claimed that for most programs it ...
Show full article (1.60Kb) · Show article thread
Re: curious about 8 byte LOGICAL...     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for curious about 8 byte LOGICAL in comp.lang.fortran
Author: glen herrmannsfeldt
Date: Apr 24, 2008 00:39

..., but it will be much less important for subscript values. For four byte integer and eight byte real, you can address 8GB and 16GB respectively with a signed 32 bit integer. (Double... They have let us know it. Which problem? That the default integer isn't 8 bytes, or that no integer is eight bytes. I claimed that for most programs it wouldn't be ...
Show full article (1.32Kb) · Show article thread
Re: curious about 8 byte LOGICAL...     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for curious about 8 byte LOGICAL in comp.lang.fortran
Author: Gary Scott
Date: Apr 23, 2008 05:30

... chandler <epc8@juno.com> wrote: 2. Is it legal to set aside 8 bytes for a REAL but use only 4? Yes, though that would be a...but I have seen: Integers that take 4 bytes of storage, but only use 2 of ... Double precision reals that take 128 bytes of storage, but only use 80 ... Considering the subject of the thread, logicals that take any of several sizes,...
Show full article (1.46Kb) · Show article thread
Re: curious about 8 byte LOGICAL...     

Group: comp.lang.fortran · Group Profile · Search for curious about 8 byte LOGICAL in comp.lang.fortran
Author: glen herrmannsfeldt
Date: Apr 22, 2008 22:45

e p chandler wrote: (snip) 1. So when the default numeric storage unit is 8 bytes on PCs, what happens to DOUBLE PRECISION? 2. Is it legal to set aside 8 bytes for a REAL but use only 4? 3...., I find it unlikely that the default will be eight byte integer and real, with 16 byte double precision. (Until good hardware support for 16 byte reals.) -- glen
Show full article (0.71Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · next