"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:485BA65F.927847E2@hotmail.com Soundhaspriority wrote: And if Marc Phillips can't argue honestly, if Marc Phillips resorts to misrepresentation of the position of others, it's good reason not to trust his published audio opinions or advice. If a man is dishonest in one sphere, he may very well be dishonest
Soundhaspriority wrote: And if Marc Phillips can't argue honestly, if Marc Phillips resorts to misrepresentation of the position of others, it's good reason not to trust his published audio opinons or advice. If a man is dishonest in one sphere, he may very well be dishonest in another. And the reason for this advice today ? Since when was ANY paid audio reviewer honest ?
Soundhaspriority wrote: And if Marc Phillips can't argue honestly, if Marc Phillips resorts to misrepresentation of the position of others, it's good reason not to trust his published audio opinons or advice. If a man is dishonest in one sphere, he may very well be dishonest in another. And the reason for this advice today ? Since when was ANY paid audio reviewer honest ?
Archive-name: AudioFAQ/part2 Last-modified: 2007/07/12 Version: 2.16 9.0 High Fidelity Systems People frequently use the term "Stereo" to refer to a sound reproduction system. To be more accurate, we will use the term High Fidelity System to refer to a pile of equipment including at least one source, at least one amplifier, and at least one speaker. Common sources are turntables
Archive-name: AudioFAQ/part12 Last-modified: 2007/07/12 Version: 2.17 19.0 The Press 19.1 Which magazine should I read? Which ever one you like. None are absolutely objective. Here's a list of some common ones: audioXpress ($30/yr 12 issues) (Do-it-yourself) Note: This is the successor of Audio Amateur, Glass Audio, and Speaker Builder Magazines Audio Amateur Publications
