archaic words
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 10 articles for 0.961 sec
On May 13, 11:30 pm, "Peter Farey" <pete...@rey.prestel.co.uk> wrote: > Dear Don and Ed, > > There is something about Shakespeare which, through no fault > of your own, you currently don't appear to appreciate. This is > that not only Shakespearean scholars but most (if not all!) > Shakespearean directors and actors have also discovered some- > thing  really special in the way that Shakespeare     

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for archaic words in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: spinoza1111
Date: May 13, 2010 22:57

On May 13, 11:30 pm, "Peter Farey" <pete...@rey.prestel.co.uk> wrote: Dear Don and Ed, There is something about Shakespeare which, through no fault of your own, you currently don't appear to appreciate. This is that not only Shakespearean scholars but most (if not all!) Shakespearean directors and actors have also discovered some- thing  really special in the way that Shakespeare
Show full article (6.99Kb) · Show article thread
On Thu, 13 May 2010 16:30:14 +0100, "Peter Farey" <peter.f@rey.prestel.co.uk> wrote: > >Dear Don and Ed, > >There is something about Shakespeare which, through no fault >of your own, you currently don't appear to appreciate. This is >that not only Shakespearean scholars but most (if not all!) >Shakespearean directors and actors have also discovered some- >thing really special in the     

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for archaic words in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: spinoza1111
Date: May 13, 2010 22:28

On May 14, 10:48 am, spinoza1111 <spinoza1...@yahoo.com> wrote: On May 13, 11:30 pm, "Peter Farey" <pete...@rey.prestel.co.uk> wrote: Dear Don and Ed, There is something about Shakespeare which, through no fault of your own, you currently don't appear to appreciate. This is that not only Shakespearean scholars but most (if not all!) Shakespearean directors and actors
Show full article (4.82Kb) · Show article thread
On May 13, 11:30 pm, "Peter Farey" <pete...@rey.prestel.co.uk> wrote: > Dear Don and Ed, > > There is something about Shakespeare which, through no fault > of your own, you currently don't appear to appreciate. This is > that not only Shakespearean scholars but most (if not all!) > Shakespearean directors and actors have also discovered some- > thing  really special in the way that Shakespeare     

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for archaic words in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: bookburn
Date: May 13, 2010 21:40

On May 13, 11:30 pm, "Peter Farey" <pete...@rey.prestel.co.uk> wrote: Dear Don and Ed, There is something about Shakespeare which, through no fault of your own, you currently don't appear to appreciate. This is that not only Shakespearean scholars but most (if not all!) Shakespearean directors and actors have also discovered some- thing  really special in the way that Shakespeare
Show full article (4.00Kb) · Show article thread
On May 13, 3:03�pm, bookb...@yahoo.com wrote: > Other thread was getting a bit long and internecine, and I found Peter > F's new post back in the middle, so taking the liberty of starting > another. �PF's post evidently responds to spinoza's posting of his New > PLay and citing the Wall Street Times' publishing of a war poem in > questionable blank verse. � > --------------------- > > Peter     

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for archaic words in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: spinoza1111
Date: May 13, 2010 21:22

"Jenn" <jennbeez@gmail.com> wrote in message news:eee001a7-7c22-4ba7-9088-a34cd855b90d@24g2000yqy.googlegroups.com... On May 8, 11:26 pm, "Brian Smith" <dcg_br...@hotmail.com> wrote: I knew this was about from me from the sounds of your initial post I'm just surprised you didn't have the balls to call me out instead of posting that bullshit about independent thought. You make
Show full article (7.02Kb) · Show article thread
Other thread was getting a bit long and internecine, and I found Peter F's new post back in the middle, so taking the liberty of starting another. PF's post evidently responds to spinoza's posting of his New PLay and citing the Wall Street Times' publishing of a war poem in questionable blank verse. --------------------- Peter F said: Dear Don and Ed, There is something about Shakespeare     

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for archaic words in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: spinoza1111
Date: May 13, 2010 19:51

Dear Don and Ed, There is something about Shakespeare which, through no fault of your own, you currently don't appear to appreciate. This is that not only Shakespearean scholars but most (if not all!) Shakespearean directors and actors have also discovered some- thing really special in the way that Shakespeare used the iambic pentameter. This, and the way in which the content of his
Show full article (3.58Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for archaic words in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: spinoza1111
Date: May 13, 2010 19:48

Show full article (4.31Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for archaic words in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: lackpurity
Date: May 13, 2010 16:38

Show full article (4.77Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.tv.survivor · Group Profile · Search for archaic words in alt.tv.survivor
Author: Brian Smith
Date: May 13, 2010 14:04

Show full article (1.19Kb)
    

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for archaic words in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: bookburn
Date: May 13, 2010 13:03

Show full article (3.28Kb)
    

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for archaic words in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: Peter Farey
Date: May 13, 2010 08:30

Show full article (2.94Kb)