|
|
|
  |
|
|
|
|   |
| Author posting activity |
| |
Week |
Month |
3 Months |
| Threads |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Posts |
7 |
12 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
  |
|
|
|
| |
|
  |
| Author's most active threads |
DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review)
Started Lucas Nussbaum · Date: Aug 11, 2008 16:30 ·
Posts: 7 / 60 (Adeodato Simó / total) |
confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)
Started Robert Millan · Date: Aug 3, 2008 05:30 ·
Posts: 4 / 30 (Adeodato Simó / total) |
DEP1: Clarifying policies and workflows for Non Maintainer Uploads
Started Bas Wijnen · Date: Apr 24, 2008 12:40 ·
Posts: 3 / 19 (Adeodato Simó / total) |
package ownership in Debian (was: Why does Ubuntu have all the ideas?)
Started martin f krafft · Date: Jul 28, 2006 10:10 ·
Posts: 2 / 51 (Adeodato Simó / total) |
Re: Why does Ubuntu have all the ideas?
Started Anthony Towns · Date: Jul 30, 2006 20:10 ·
Posts: 2 / 18 (Adeodato Simó / total) |
Re: package ownership in Debian
Started MJ Ray · Date: Jul 28, 2006 14:20 ·
Posts: 1 / 4 (Adeodato Simó / total) |
Re: package ownership in Debian (was: Why does Ubuntu have all the ideas?)
Started Fabio Tranchitella · Date: Jul 28, 2006 11:00 ·
Posts: 1 / 9 (Adeodato Simó / total) |
Branding for Debian derivatives
Started Anthony Towns · Date: Jul 29, 2006 00:20 ·
Posts: 1 / 10 (Adeodato Simó / total) |
DebianTimes launched
Started Andreas Barth · Date: Aug 3, 2006 12:40 ·
Posts: 1 / 16 (Adeodato Simó / total) |
Concerns with Open/OS Corporate Linux ads?
Started martin f krafft · Date: Aug 29, 2006 10:20 ·
Posts: 1 / 10 (Adeodato Simó / total) |
|
|
|
  |
|
|
| Latest posts |
Re: About the use of epicene "they" in technical documents.
Date: Aug 15, 2008 02:50
|
Re: About the use of epicene "they" in technical documents.
Date: Aug 14, 2008 16:30
|
Re: About the use of epicene "they" in technical documents.
Date: Aug 13, 2008 16:50
|
Re: DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review)
Date: Aug 12, 2008 17:00
|
Re: objecting to +nmuX syntax (was DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review))
Date: Aug 12, 2008 14:40
|
Re: DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review)
Date: Aug 12, 2008 12:50
|
objecting to +nmuX syntax (was DEP1: Non Maintainer Uploads (final call for review))
Date: Aug 12, 2008 12:40
|
Re: Deprecating (and deactivation) of an archive feature?!
Date: Aug 6, 2008 17:40
|
Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)
Date: Aug 5, 2008 15:20
|
Re: confusion about non-free (Re: Bits from the Debian Eee PC team, summer 2008)
Date: Aug 5, 2008 13:30
|
|
|
|