|
|
|
  |
|
|
|
| |
| Author posting activity |
| |
Week |
Month |
3 Months |
| Threads |
1 |
1 |
11 |
| Posts |
4 |
8 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Author's most active threads |
Is Fortran faster than C?
Started Vista · Date: Jul 3, 2007 19:05 ·
Posts: 10 / 148 (Greg Lindahl / total) |
Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
Started Clive Page · Date: Jun 27, 2008 08:30 ·
Posts: 9 / 161 (Greg Lindahl / total) |
Fortran 90 modules suck for portability- why use them?
Date: Jul 13, 2007 12:15 ·
Posts: 8 / 36 (Greg Lindahl / total) |
APL2007 update
Started Mike Kent · Date: Oct 3, 2007 05:21 ·
Posts: 8 / 87 (Greg Lindahl / total) |
GFORTRAN PROBLEM WITH SAVE STATEMENT
Started mark.w.easter · Date: Nov 24, 2007 21:15 ·
Posts: 8 / 46 (Greg Lindahl / total) |
SPEC CPU2006 announced
Started John.L.Henning · Date: Aug 24, 2006 05:48 ·
Posts: 6 / 71 (Greg Lindahl / total) |
Re: Why these original FORTRAN quirks?
Started Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj · Date: Oct 16, 2006 17:45 ·
Posts: 6 / 223 (Greg Lindahl / total) |
Online F77 information...
Started magesing · Date: Oct 29, 2006 07:16 ·
Posts: 6 / 31 (Greg Lindahl / total) |
max(NaN,0) should be NaN
Started norb1 · Date: Aug 27, 2006 18:19 ·
Posts: 5 / 100 (Greg Lindahl / total) |
new look for google: sharp
Started Wade Ward · Date: Oct 4, 2007 12:20 ·
Posts: 4 / 7 (Greg Lindahl / total) |
|
| Most active threads sterted by author |
Re: Popularity contests
Date: Dec 6, 2006 07:53 ·
Posts: 6 |
NYT disses Fortran
Date: May 30, 2008 22:57 ·
Posts: 4 |
Re: Multithreading on Multicore Processors
Date: Jan 15, 2007 18:13 ·
Posts: 3 |
g77 t shirt
Date: Jan 8, 2007 14:11 ·
Posts: 2 |
Re: ARRAY EQUATION VS FORALL
Date: Nov 21, 2006 14:56 ·
Posts: 2 |
Re: Commutative law in addition in XL Fortran
Date: May 14, 2007 10:35 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: Commutative law in addition in XL Fortran
Date: May 11, 2007 22:28 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: Two problems
Date: May 10, 2007 19:43 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: how to compile code on linux(32bit) for linux(64bit)
Date: May 9, 2007 11:53 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: fortran maintenance tools
Date: May 3, 2007 15:01 ·
Posts: 1 |
|
|
|
| Latest threads |
NYT disses Fortran
Date: May 30, 2008 22:57 ·
Posts: 4 |
Re: Commutative law in addition in XL Fortran
Date: May 14, 2007 10:35 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: Commutative law in addition in XL Fortran
Date: May 11, 2007 22:28 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: Two problems
Date: May 10, 2007 19:43 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: how to compile code on linux(32bit) for linux(64bit)
Date: May 9, 2007 11:53 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: fortran maintenance tools
Date: May 3, 2007 15:01 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: fortran maintenance tools
Date: May 3, 2007 11:52 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: fortran is more popular
Date: May 2, 2007 18:07 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: How old is the average Fortran programmer?
Date: Apr 27, 2007 13:55 ·
Posts: 1 |
Re: fortran and preprocessor
Date: Apr 15, 2007 18:13 ·
Posts: 1 |
|
| Latest posts |
Re: whole number constants
Date: Jul 22, 2008 03:07
|
Re: Anyone know about this error?
Date: Jul 20, 2008 22:55
|
Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
Date: Jul 20, 2008 20:31
|
Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
Date: Jul 20, 2008 16:54
|
Re: Public review - LEADZ and TRAILZ
Date: Jul 6, 2008 20:52
|
Re: public comment on fortran 2008
Date: Jul 5, 2008 13:44
|
Re: public comment on fortran 2008
Date: Jul 3, 2008 00:29
|
Re: public comment on fortran 2008
Date: Jul 2, 2008 18:29
|
Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
Date: Jun 30, 2008 16:07
|
Re: Is it time to legitimise REAL*8 etc?
Date: Jun 29, 2008 18:53
|
|
|
|
