Hi, I've temporarily reverted the Makefile that Michael pointed out which was causing building of current to fail and made a full distribution. If anyone would like to get a copy of it, you can get it here: ftp://bbk.ziaspace.com/pub/ Have fun! John Klos -- Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V. Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-admin@muc
>Number: 37733 Category: toolchain Synopsis: compiler segfault when building qt3-libs-3.3.8nb7 Confidential: no Severity: serious Priority: medium Responsible: toolchain-manager State: open Class: sw-bug Submitter-Id: net Arrival-Date: Wed Jan 09 23:05:00 +0000 2008 Originator: Tim Release: 4.0 Organization
John Klos wrote: ftp://boobookitty.ziaspace.com/pub/netbsd-4/mac68k-040/ John, These are working great on my Q840. Thanks much. Does uname -r report "4.0_STABLE" instead of simply "4.0" because this is not an official build? Tim -- Tim & Alethea christtrek.org -- Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V. Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news
John Klos wrote: I've gotten into the habit of compiling NetBSD with processor specific optimizations for some added speed. I regularly use m68060 compiled sets on two Amigas and m68040 compiled sets on two m68k Macs, so I'd consider them pretty well tested. I don't have any m68030 Macs, so it'd be good to get some feedback should anyone test these. The optimized binaries
Hi, all, I've gotten into the habit of compiling NetBSD with processor specific optimizations for some added speed. I regularly use m68060 compiled sets on two Amigas and m68040 compiled sets on two m68k Macs, so I'd consider them pretty well tested. I don't have any m68030 Macs, so it'd be good to get some feedback should anyone test these. The optimized binaries are noticeably snappier
