Received: from [127.0.0.1] by openbrick.kicks-ass.net (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.6.0)); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:34:16 -0400 Received: from [190.190.73.100] by openbrick.kicks-ass.net (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.6.0)); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:34:13 -0400 Received: from [190.190.73.100] by mail.itic.de; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 -01:12:45
Mail received on spamtrap. This spamtrap mail has been redacted, the mail was not really sent to <Lorean5565@users.spamikaze.org>. URLs have been stripped of the parts before and after the host name. From tina1@four-soft.com Sat Apr 26 02:18:18 2008 Return-path: <tina1@four-soft.com> Received: from [mail.victim.example] (helo=humbolt.mail.victim.example) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtp
You point at one server and that server talks to the session broker who then assigns the user to a server. It's similar to what Citrix does with ZDC's just not nearly as advanced. I'm not 100%% sure this will work with remoteapps but I don't see why it wouldn't. -- Jeff Pitsch Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services "John" <John@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7BBF0CA8
Received: from [77.51.128.45] by openbrick.kicks-ass.net (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.6.0)); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:08:21 -0400 Received: from [77.51.128.45] by mail.burresi.de; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:08:19 +0300 From: "Chi Hewitt" <nadirn@burresi.de> To: <[removed]> Subject: A Rolex watch# qp toflil qmpy Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:08:19 +0300 Message-ID: <01c9
