... latest (one too many) fixed speed camera notification. He claims that ... sighted traffic sign obscured the speed camera warning sign. So, are ... in this situation, that the camera warning sign would have been ...he not been breaking the speed limit in the first place...able to see the actual cameras? He could get a smaller...adequate warning that there are cameras on some of our roads...

... appeal against his latest (one too many) fixed speed camera notification. He claims that a more recently sighted traffic sign obscured the speed camera warning sign. So, are the highways ... quite possible, in this situation, that the camera warning sign would have been adequately visible had he not been breaking the speed limit in the first place? Seems ...

... who has agreed to take on an appeal against his latest (one too many) fixed speed camera notification. LOL, he'll pay through the nose, hopefully for nothing. He claims that a more recently sighted traffic sign obscured the speed camera warning sign. If that's his defence he wants fucking. Sideways. So, are the highways authority ...

... on an appeal against his latest (one too many) fixed speed camera notification. He claims that a more recently sighted traffic sign obscured the speed camera warning sign. So, are the highways authority required to provide adequate visible warnings in ... of most (I think all) of the "safety camera partnership" schemes that allow the revenue generated to be ...

... on an appeal against his latest (one too many) fixed speed camera notification. He claims that a more recently sighted traffic sign obscured the speed camera warning sign. ROFL...good luck. So, are the highways authority required to provide adequate visible... No. They're only placed in areas where the camera funds go to the SCP instead of the Govt. ...

...a solicitor who has agreed to take on an appeal against his latest (one too many) fixed speed camera notification. He claims that a more recently sighted traffic sign obscured the speed camera warning sign. So, are the highways authority required to provide adequate visible warnings in this way? Also, if so...

... ban, claims that he has seen a solicitor who has agreed to take on an appeal against his latest (one too many) fixed speed camera notification. He claims that a more recently sighted traffic sign obscured the speed camera warning sign. So he's going to try claiming, is he, that there is no need to obey ...

...a solicitor who has agreed to take on an appeal against his latest (one too many) fixed speed camera notification. He claims that a more recently sighted traffic sign obscured the speed camera warning sign. So, are the highways authority required to provide adequate visible warnings in this way? Also, if so...

... agreed to take on an appeal against his latest (one too many) fixed speed camera notification. He claims that a more recently sighted traffic sign obscured the speed camera warning sign. So, are the highways ... quite possible, in this situation, that the camera warning sign would have been adequately visible had he not been breaking the speed limit in the first place?

allan tracy wrote: Why not tell him about the alternative? Don't speed. He's been caught, tough shit. Well he is the sort of arrogant twat that deserves it. Let's put it this way - the whole office is wearing a rather wry smile at the moment. Having said that he stands to lose his company car (luckily not his job). If he doesn't need the company car to do his...