On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 07:24 -0800, Earl Violet wrote: Will X for Etch include support for the 1152x900 resolution for Sun monosync monitors? I bluffed my way through with XF86 but Xorg doesn't seem to be as gullible. Can't you just add the appropriate modeline to the X.org config? http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/XFree86-Video-Timings-HOWTO/index.html What is the actual problem you're ...
Will X for Etch include support for the 1152x900 resolution for Sun monosync monitors? I bluffed my way through with XF86 but Xorg doesn't seem to be as gullible. Earl Violet URL http://deserthowler.cjb.net Instant messenger: earlcoyote ICQ:64033496 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the ...
... with no success, i'm pretty sure that nvidia's documentation is similar to ati's -- read the xfree86 driver. unfortunately in the case of the nvidia driver, there are several real bugs in the xf86 driver (like stuffing a 0x480 into an 8-bit register with one bit of overflow and stuffing 0x100 into a different 8-bit register with no overflow.) by the way, i am having some trouble with the ...
Is Xorg in ETCH going to support the default SPARC 1152 x 900 resolution? That was a tough workaround for me with SARGE and XF86. The choice of low cost SPARC monitors is very limited. Earl URL http://deserthowler.cjb.net Instant messenger: earlcoyote ICQ:64033496 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam ...
I have a Creator 3D card. I'm mentioning this because I spent about 3 days trying to get XF86 working. In frustration, I put the machine a way for a while and when I plugged it again it worked. Maybe this will save some a bunch of frustration. Earl --- Martin <inkubus@interalpha.co.uk> wrote: On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 08:14 -0700, Earl Violet wrote: I have Debian stable installed on...
... spamassassin from v2 to v3, but it may be OK to introduce a new spamassassin v3 package). Or, no XF86 -> XOrg transition, but perhaps a new XF86 point release with more HW support could work This should not happen *in* the stable distribution since it would become a floating target ...
...> spamassassin from v2 to v3, but it may be OK to introduce a new spamassassin v3 package). Or, no XF86 -> XOrg transition, but perhaps a new XF86 point release with more HW support could work This should not happen *in* the stable distribution since it would become a floating target instead....