--On February 23, 2008 9:58:22 AM -0800 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: I'm finding it especially "interesting" that /etc/make.conf, which to judge from its location is part of the base, depends on a setting from something in the /usr/ports tree. Well, actually it doesn't. What gives you this impression? Paul Schmehl reported where LOCALBASE is set: in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd
> >> * What is the value of LOCALBASE? I'm not finding any definition, or other reference, in /etc/make.conf. Just set it to ${LOCALBASE} verbatim. Not what you think is the value of the variable LOCALBASE but the word ${LOCALBASE}. Academic interest :) I'm finding it especially "interesting" that /etc/make.conf, which to judge from its location
--On Thursday, February 21, 2008 23:07:29 -0800 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: After updating with portsnap, I am getting an insufficiently-helpful error message: On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default X11BASE by itself so please help it a bit by setting X11BASE=${LOCALBASE} in make.conf. On the other hand, if you do wish to use non
After updating with portsnap, I am getting an insufficiently-helpful error message: On FreeBSD before 6.2 ports system unfortunately can not set default X11BASE by itself so please help it a bit by setting X11BASE=${LOCALBASE} in make.conf. On the other hand, if you do wish to use non-default X11BASE, please set variable USE_NONDEFAULT_X11BASE. * Am I correct in *guessing*
