Wt7
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 928 articles for 0.315 sec
Wolfspawn wrote: > On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, PV wrote: > > >>Wolfspawn <cr608@bfn.org> writes: >> >>>It is correct to say it was NOT "directly" caused by the plane crash, if >>>you choose "directly" to be confined to the seconds following the crash. >> >>Even then, not necessarily. Who's to say that a piece of flaming plane >>wreckage, isn't what started the fire at WT7? If I remember right     

Group: rec.audio.pro · Group Profile · Search for Wt7 in rec.audio.pro
Author: Dennis M. Hammes
Date: Sep 20, 2008 08:02

PV wrote: Wolfspawn <cr608@bfn.org> writes: It is correct to say it was NOT "directly" caused by the plane crash, if you choose "directly" to be confined to the seconds following the crash. Even then, not necessarily. Who's to say that a piece of flaming plane wreckage, isn't what started the fire at WT7? If I remember right, pieces of plane were found quite some distance
Show full article (1.20Kb) · Show article thread
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, PV wrote: > Wolfspawn <cr608@bfn.org> writes: > >It is correct to say it was NOT "directly" caused by the plane crash, if > >you choose "directly" to be confined to the seconds following the crash. > > Even then, not necessarily. Who's to say that a piece of flaming plane > wreckage, isn't what started the fire at WT7? If I remember right, pieces > of plane were found     

Group: rec.audio.pro · Group Profile · Search for Wt7 in rec.audio.pro
Author: Dennis M. Hammes
Date: Sep 20, 2008 08:00

On Sep 18, 8:15 pm, thro...@sheol.org (Wayne Throop) wrote: : theget <the...@bigmailbox.net> : Almost zero. But that point should be explained to someone who thinks : that not all of the damage can be attributed to planes because of : three buildings that collapsed only two were hit by planes. FWIW, it might be (or have been) better to address these issues by clarifying the "buildings
Show full article (1.50Kb) · Show article thread
: theget <theget@bigmailbox.net> : Almost zero. But that point should be explained to someone who thinks : that not all of the damage can be attributed to planes because of : three buildings that collapsed only two were hit by planes. FWIW, it might be (or have been) better to address these issues by clarifying the "buildings collapsed in the same manner", rather than "due to aircraft". *Was*     

Group: rec.audio.pro · Group Profile · Search for Wt7 in rec.audio.pro
Author: Wolfspawn
Date: Sep 19, 2008 09:14

On Sep 18, 4:40 pm, pv+use...@pobox.com (PV) wrote: "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seaw...@sgeinc.invalid.com> writes: "*DIRECT* plane damage can't explain the collapse. It was INdirect plane damage, caused by the collapse and fire of the other two buildings and the lack of firefighting capability at the time and location of WTC 7, that caused it to collapse." This is called
Show full article (0.87Kb) · Show article thread
On 12 Sep., 00:46, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Sep 11, 1:21 pm, Sockeye <whalingstat...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 11, 12:41 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Sep 10, 6:28 pm, Sock in the eye <whalingstat...@hotmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > On 10 Sep., 19:37, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 10, 5:21 pm, Sock in the eye <whalingstat     

Group: rec.audio.pro · Group Profile · Search for Wt7 in rec.audio.pro
Author: theget
Date: Sep 18, 2008 17:41

On Sep 11, 1:21 pm, Sockeye <whalingstat...@hotmail.com> wrote: On Sep 11, 12:41 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Sep 10, 6:28 pm, Sock in the eye <whalingstat...@hotmail.com> wrote: On 10 Sep., 19:37, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Sep 10, 5:21 pm, Sock in the eye <whalingstat...@hotmail.com> wrote: On Sep 10, 3:44 pm
Show full article (1.08Kb) · Show article thread
On Sep 11, 12:41 am, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Sep 10, 6:28 pm, Sock in the eye <whalingstat...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On 10 Sep., 19:37, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 10, 5:21 pm, Sock in the eye <whalingstat...@hotmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > On Sep 10, 3:44 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 10, 11:51 am, Sockeye <whalingstat     

Group: rec.audio.pro · Group Profile · Search for Wt7 in rec.audio.pro
Author: Wayne Throop
Date: Sep 18, 2008 17:15

On Sep 10, 6:28 pm, Sock in the eye <whalingstat...@hotmail.com> wrote: On 10 Sep., 19:37, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Sep 10, 5:21 pm, Sock in the eye <whalingstat...@hotmail.com> wrote: On Sep 10, 3:44 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Sep 10, 11:51 am, Sockeye <whalingstat...@hotmail.com> wrote: On 9 Sep., 22:12, Iarnrod <iarn.
Show full article (0.75Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.audio.pro · Group Profile · Search for Wt7 in rec.audio.pro
Author: theget
Date: Sep 18, 2008 15:14

Show full article (1.78Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.terrorism.worldtradecenter · Group Profile · Search for Wt7 in alt.terrorism.worldtradecenter
Author: Sockeye
Date: Sep 12, 2008 08:33

Show full article (5.29Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.terrorism.worldtradecenter · Group Profile · Search for Wt7 in alt.terrorism.worldtradecenter
Author: Iarnrod
Date: Sep 11, 2008 21:46

Show full article (5.03Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.terrorism.worldtradecenter · Group Profile · Search for Wt7 in alt.terrorism.worldtradecenter
Author: Sockeye
Date: Sep 11, 2008 12:21

Show full article (4.53Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.terrorism.worldtradecenter · Group Profile · Search for Wt7 in alt.terrorism.worldtradecenter
Author: Iarnrod
Date: Sep 10, 2008 21:41

Show full article (4.16Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next