Writer s Block Your Threads
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 863 articles for 0.672 sec
It also provides a wealth of information for those wanting to know wht you're doing! Stephanie <sajesqnyc@yahoo.com> penned.wrote.stated: : On Mar 23, 7:24?pm, Jsteam <fftN...@main.com> wrote: :> Stephanie, thank you SO MUCH for posting this instead of being another casualty fo the :> battle. ?You are going places you've never gone before, and cigaretes won't take you :> there. ?You knowthat     

Group: alt.support.stopsmoking · Group Profile · Search for Writer s Block Your Threads in alt.support.stopsmoking
Author: Jsteam
Date: Mar 24, 2008 07:31

On Mar 23, 7:24 pm, Jsteam <fftN...@main.com> wrote: Stephanie, thank you SO MUCH for posting this instead of being another casualty fo the battle.  You are going places you've never gone before, and cigaretes won't take you there.  You knowthat.  They only want to sap your strength and make you feel like shit.  And smell so, too.  Which isn't you!  Take a deep breath and walk around the
Show full article (2.62Kb) · Show article thread
On Mar 23, 3:02 pm, Sue <sebr...@thegrid.net> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:59:56 -0700 (PDT), Stephanie > > <sajesq...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >I am in my last 8 week stretch in my Columbia program and the amount > >of work to be done in these 8 weeks is simply unimaginable. Finals of > >course, but also critical book reviews, a fieldwork project, the > >design and implementation of an experiment     

Group: alt.support.stopsmoking · Group Profile · Search for Writer s Block Your Threads in alt.support.stopsmoking
Author: Stephanie
Date: Mar 24, 2008 07:20

"bf" <bfordyce@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:84f93af3-7690-4e88-99ca-296ba85266ee@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... On May 14, 7:56 am, Advance Scout <ivan...@nospam.com> wrote: Now that Lex is leaving the show- which plot lines have been left unfinished? I think that level 33.1 was still unfinished and his cloning subplot.... or have both of those seen closure? (following smallville
Show full article (2.45Kb) · Show article thread
If you want to partner up, I'll be happy to provide with you lotsa' tangents :-)) Joseph M. Newcomer wrote: > The problem is that only these tangents remind me of some of the history; if I sat down to > write it, I'd probably quickly get "writer's block". > joe > > On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:01:27 -0500, BobF <nothanks@spamfree.world> wrote: > >> Wow ... You ever think of writing one     

Group: alt.support.stopsmoking · Group Profile · Search for Writer s Block Your Threads in alt.support.stopsmoking
Author: Stephanie
Date: Mar 23, 2008 14:35

The problem is that only these tangents remind me of some of the history; if I sat down to write it, I'd probably quickly get "writer's block". joe On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:01:27 -0500, BobF <nothanks@spamfree.world> wrote: Wow ... You ever think of writing one of those "History of Computing" kind of books? Seriously. It's a shame we have to wait for MFC tangents to get this
Show full article (4.33Kb) · Show article thread
On Jun 24, 4:13 am, boroph...@gmail.com wrote: > Is it possible to access a critical section of code from both multiple > threads (running on N processors) and interrupt context? For a > uniprocessor machine, a simple cli instruction will protect between > interrupt and thread context, but for multiprocessor machines, where > each CPU is capable of accessing the critical section, I'm guessing     

Group: alt.tv.smallville · Group Profile · Search for Writer s Block Your Threads in alt.tv.smallville
Author: BC
Date: May 16, 2008 19:13

David Xu wrote: I just want to make some programs to work, since Linux and Solaris both have it now. Doing it in kernel is OK, but I don't want to put it into the kernel until it is necessary since kernel code can not be swapped out. ;-) Doing in kernel may have advantages, for example, you may get ride of zoombie process recycling by hacking kernel, a library version using
Show full article (1.54Kb) · Show article thread
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Ed Schouten wrote: >> * David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote: >>> I have no objections to this, but doesn't it defeat the whole >>> purpose to implement posix_spawn() as a library function that just >>> calls fork/exec? >> >> When (if?) applications start to use posix_spawn() we may decide to move >> it into the kernel at any time. It should be okay for now. > > Are     

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for Writer s Block Your Threads in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: BobF
Date: Jul 25, 2008 06:28

On Jun 12, 6:58 am, thulananda <aka.Th...@gmail.com> wrote: On Jun 12, 8:31 pm, John Radgosky <jradgo...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Jun 12, 5:31 am, thulananda <aka.Th...@gmail.com> wrote: On Jun 12, 4:19 pm, Robin <miracle...@gmail.com> wrote: Deborah wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:50:36 -0700 (PDT), jeanette_joy...@yahoo.com wrote: Although
Show full article (5.54Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for Writer s Block Your Threads in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Joseph M. Newcomer
Date: Jul 25, 2008 06:20

Show full article (5.33Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.development · Group Profile · Search for Writer s Block Your Threads in alt.os.development
Author: Alexei A. Frounze
Date: Jun 24, 2008 04:39

Show full article (1.93Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: fa.freebsd.cvsall · Group Profile · Search for Writer s Block Your Threads in fa.freebsd.cvsall
Author: David Xu
Date: Jun 17, 2008 18:43

Show full article (1.39Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: fa.freebsd.cvsall · Group Profile · Search for Writer s Block Your Threads in fa.freebsd.cvsall
Author: David Xu
Date: Jun 17, 2008 18:34

Show full article (1.72Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: talk.religion.coursemiracle · Group Profile · Search for Writer s Block Your Threads in talk.religion.coursemiracle
Author: John Radgosky
Date: Jun 12, 2008 11:09

Show full article (12.49Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next