keithr wrote: ...... By the 80s things were tending the SS way, and today I feel that good SS is every bit as good as (possibly better than) tube amplification but without all the dramas. If, however, you prefer tubes, I have no problem with that unlike some others on both sides of the debate. I think that it all comes down to personal taste. Keith Unfortunately
"DervMan" <thedervman@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4877246c$0$26085$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk... "Pete M" <pete.murray@SPAMFREEblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:g56d1p$63f$1@registered.motzarella.org... Les Ross wrote: Sounds like a lovely package, are they still used? As in, "Do people still drive 'em?" Yes. They're pretty sought after in good condition
<jimdread@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1186888592.737987.24080@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com... On Aug 11, 11:59 pm, "Peter Webb"wrote: <jimdr...@hotmail.com> wrote: If alcohol is "vastly inferior to petrol" as a fuel, how do you explain Top Alcohol Dragsters and Top Alcohol Funny Cars being so fast? They can do the quarter mile in under 7 seconds. You'd think
"A Mate" <maybe@Australia.com.au> wrote in message news:45d0627e$0$9774$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... If it's sold without a Certificate of Roadworthiness (or Safety Certificate as it's called in some States) the vehicle can not be registered legally. If you want to register - you must spend whatever is required in the way of tyres, parts and labour - to make it roadworthy or
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:32:36 -0600, Brent P wrote: In article <pan.2006.11.28.21.09.03.695963@goawayspammers.com>, arachnid wrote: Only the rich can afford to play all the games to hide income from the IRS. Since my income is roughly almost entirely wages, he isn't going to be able to do squat for me. No matter where the money comes from, you can make a significant
