Worryworts
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 20 articles for 0.303 sec
"johnsen" <johnsen@eskimo.com> wrote in message news:Xns9B1A99CED74Fjohnseneskimocom@216.196.97.136... > "David T. Ashley" <dta@e3ft.com> wrote in > news:0fKdnbfU0IV52VDVnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@giganews.com: > >> I just don't quite see that I even really quite meet the definition of a >> worrywort. > > Here's one for you to worry about ;) > > http://bryans.smugmug.com/photos/372050966_QmamK-M     

Group: rec.motorcycles · Group Profile · Search for Worryworts in rec.motorcycles
Author: David T. Ashley
Date: Sep 15, 2008 16:08

"slotrot" <Robert.Taubman@gmail.com> wrote in message news:2ab5f37f-a7a7-4880-bb56-0160163b3bbb@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com... Obama is in trouble only in the minds of Republican pollsters and worryworts. The only poll the counts is the one that counts and tabulates the actual votes. All others are just useless speculation. It has nothing to do with "Republican pollsters" and everything
Show full article (0.51Kb) · Show article thread
"slotrot" <Robert.Taubman@gmail.com> wrote in message news:2ab5f37f-a7a7-4880-bb56-0160163b3bbb@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com... On Sep 6, 3:28 pm, "Rambler III" <Ramble...@xyz.com> wrote: > Saturday, September 06, 2008 > > The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday > shows Barack Obama attracting 46%% of the vote while McCain earns 45%%. > When "leaners" are included     

Group: rec.motorcycles · Group Profile · Search for Worryworts in rec.motorcycles
Author: johnsen
Date: Sep 15, 2008 15:07

On Sep 6, 3:28 pm, "Rambler III" <Ramble...@xyz.com> wrote: Saturday, September 06, 2008 The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows Barack Obama attracting 46%% of the vote while McCain earns 45%%. When "leaners" are included, it's Obama 49%%, McCain 46%% (see recent daily results). Tracking Poll results are released at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time each
Show full article (0.30Kb)
"." <RhiannonX@gmail.com> wrote in message news:3e6918dd-b9e7-4bfe-abd0-ef2f537c8b7e@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com... >On Mar 8, 3:51�pm, "David T. Ashley" <d...@e3ft.com> wrote: > >> For the record, I am both a worrywort and a wuss. �I'm not even going to >> try >> to deny it. > >Well, take whatever vestiges of courage and manhood you can muster, >and go out and do things that seem frighteningly     

Group: alt.war.civil.usa · Group Profile · Search for Worryworts in alt.war.civil.usa
Author: Gregory E. Garland
Date: Sep 6, 2008 22:19

On Mar 8, 3:51�pm, "David T. Ashley" <d...@e3ft.com> wrote: First, I was curious how one would best implement HP restrictions (hardware or software). The factory could easily map the chip in the ECU to prevent the fuel injection system from providing enough fuel to exceed some given horsepower level, and they could easily retard the spark at some critical RPM level in the same manner
Show full article (0.73Kb) · Show article thread
>"." <RhiannonX@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:b293ca48-0818-42e4-8740-e2dc5aeaa708@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com... >On Mar 8, 2:52�pm, "David T. Ashley" <d...@e3ft.com> wrote: > Are there reliable figures on top speed out there? �I can't seem to find > any > reliable ones (done by testing). > >I don't need a test to know that machine has the beans to go 135 to >140 mph. > > Also, I've     

Group: alt.war.civil.usa · Group Profile · Search for Worryworts in alt.war.civil.usa
Author: Raymond O'Hara
Date: Sep 6, 2008 17:51

On Mar 8, 2:52�pm, "David T. Ashley" <d...@e3ft.com> wrote: Are there reliable figures on top speed out there? �I can't seem to find any reliable ones (done by testing). I don't need a test to know that machine has the beans to go 135 to 140 mph. Also, I've found hints here and there that there is something you can add to the bike to limit it to 35 BHP or so for learners. �Couldn't
Show full article (1.77Kb) · Show article thread
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 20:39 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > So we should also never upgrade /usr/bin/python, /usr/bin/perl, or > /usr/bin/gcc to point at a new upstream version because users may have local > programs that assume particular non-standard behavior from these programs, > right? I think that's a different case. There is a big difference between a newer version of the same program     

Group: alt.war.civil.usa · Group Profile · Search for Worryworts in alt.war.civil.usa
Author: slotrot
Date: Sep 6, 2008 16:59

Show full article (1.31Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.motorcycles · Group Profile · Search for Worryworts in rec.motorcycles
Author: David T. Ashley
Date: Mar 8, 2008 18:19

Show full article (1.92Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.motorcycles · Group Profile · Search for Worryworts in rec.motorcycles
Author: .
Date: Mar 8, 2008 17:27

Show full article (1.65Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.motorcycles · Group Profile · Search for Worryworts in rec.motorcycles
Author: David T. Ashley
Date: Mar 8, 2008 15:51

Show full article (1.72Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.motorcycles · Group Profile · Search for Worryworts in rec.motorcycles
Author: .
Date: Mar 8, 2008 15:42

Show full article (0.76Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: linux.debian.devel · Group Profile · Search for Worryworts in linux.debian.devel
Author: Thomas Bushnell BSG
Date: Feb 10, 2008 21:00

Show full article (0.86Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next