Workunits
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 49 articles for 0.303 sec
============ By changing the parameter of "Maximum daily WU quota per CPU" from 150 (what it is now) to something reasonable like 15, this problem could fix itself almost instantly. When the database issue calm down, only increment "WU per CPU" by 5 and then see how it impacts database performance. Keep upping or downing this number until smooth and transparent operation of the DB becomes     

Group: comp.distributed · Group Profile · Search for Workunits in comp.distributed
Author: Max Power
Date: Apr 25, 2008 20:22

============ By changing the parameter of "Maximum daily WU quota per CPU" from 150 (what it is now) to something reasonable like 15, this problem could fix itself almost instantly. When the database issue calm down, only increment "WU per CPU" by 5 and then see how it impacts database performance. Keep upping or downing this number until smooth and transparent operation of the DB becomes
Show full article (1.46Kb)
== Only some workunits break == Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) workunits fail with a 'computation error' -- with BOINC 5.4.11 (Win X86, XPSP2; fully patched). At least this seems to be true with the current version of QMC in effect at the time of posting of this message. So far no other grief from the upgrade from BOINC 5.4.9. Correction: Some newer workunits do not break, so it may be a workunit     

Group: alt.sci.seti · Group Profile · Search for Workunits in alt.sci.seti
Author: Max Power
Date: Apr 25, 2008 20:22

On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:19:22 GMT, Grandpa Chuck <GrandpaChuck@B4me.org> wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 21:34:03 -0500, "Robert Miles" <robertmiles@bellsouthNOSPAM.net> wrote: "Grandpa Chuck" <GrandpaChuck@B4me.org> wrote in message news:2etrb4dk16lfel30qvlc8hq7vo4mj9ui8t@4ax.com... On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:34:54 -0500, "Robert Miles" <robertmiles@bellsouthNOSPAM.net> wrote:
Show full article (1.46Kb)
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 21:34:03 -0500, "Robert Miles" <robertmiles@bellsouthNOSPAM.net> wrote: > >"Grandpa Chuck" <GrandpaChuck@B4me.org> wrote in message >news:2etrb4dk16lfel30qvlc8hq7vo4mj9ui8t@4ax.com... >> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:34:54 -0500, "Robert Miles" >> <robertmiles@bellsouthNOSPAM.net> wrote: >> >> What the heck is a BOINK? >> -- >> Grandpa Chuck >> -ô¿ô- >> ~ >. >BOINC is     

Group: comp.distributed · Group Profile · Search for Workunits in comp.distributed
Author: Max Power
Date: Aug 16, 2006 00:33

Somewhere on teh intarweb "Patrick Vervoorn" typed: In article <48aa7822@news2.actrix.gen.nz>, ~misfit~ <misfit61nz@hooya.com.au> wrote: Somewhere on teh intarweb "~misfit~" typed: I've got a few completed Astropulse WUs now (and another queued) but still none that have been confirmed, all still pending. I see that they only send out two copies of each (last I remember it was
Show full article (0.46Kb)
In article <48aa7822@news2.actrix.gen.nz>, ~misfit~ <misfit61nz@hooya.com.au> wrote: >Somewhere on teh intarweb "~misfit~" typed: >> I've got a few completed Astropulse WUs now (and another queued) but >> still none that have been confirmed, all still pending. I see that >> they only send out two copies of each (last I remember it was three >> of each for vanilla SETI WUs?) with one of the WUs     

Group: alt.support.diabetes · Group Profile · Search for Workunits in alt.support.diabetes
Author: guys
Date: Sep 3, 2008 11:14

Somewhere on teh intarweb "~misfit~" typed: I've got a few completed Astropulse WUs now (and another queued) but still none that have been confirmed, all still pending. I see that they only send out two copies of each (last I remember it was three of each for vanilla SETI WUs?) with one of the WUs I'm waiting on having been sent to a Pentium III 1133MHz machine that does 1068 / 1763
Show full article (1.44Kb) · Show article thread
> > > [added CC: to r.c.ladan@gmail.com as maintaner of setiathome] > > Peter Jeremy writes: > > > I notice that Einstein@Home have stopped generating S5R3 > > workunits and a new client is needed to handle the new S5R4 > > workunits. Do you have any plans to upgrade the port? > > I am also no longer receiving work units for setiathome sine > ~48 hours after the upgrade. The     

Group: alt.support.diabetes · Group Profile · Search for Workunits in alt.support.diabetes
Author: Grandpa Chuck
Date: Sep 3, 2008 10:19

[added CC: to r.c.ladan@gmail.com as maintaner of setiathome] Peter Jeremy writes: I notice that Einstein@Home have stopped generating S5R3 workunits and a new client is needed to handle the new S5R4 workunits. Do you have any plans to upgrade the port? I am also no longer receiving work units for setiathome sine ~48 hours after the upgrade. The log records: Sun Aug 17
Show full article (0.75Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.sci.seti · Group Profile · Search for Workunits in alt.sci.seti
Author: ~misfit~
Date: Sep 2, 2008 18:04

Show full article (2.88Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.sci.seti · Group Profile · Search for Workunits in alt.sci.seti
Author: Patrick Vervoorn
Date: Aug 20, 2008 02:32

Show full article (1.56Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.sci.seti · Group Profile · Search for Workunits in alt.sci.seti
Author: ~misfit~
Date: Aug 19, 2008 00:37

Show full article (1.68Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: muc.lists.freebsd.ports · Group Profile · Search for Workunits in muc.lists.freebsd.ports
Author: Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Date: Aug 17, 2008 15:17

Show full article (1.46Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: muc.lists.freebsd.ports · Group Profile · Search for Workunits in muc.lists.freebsd.ports
Author: Robert Huff
Date: Aug 17, 2008 15:13

Show full article (1.03Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · next