|
|
 |
| found 2082 articles for 0.712 sec |
  |
| On Jan 6, 1:39 pm, Katharin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 4 Jan, 23:35, ichorwhip <ichorw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 4, 4:28 am, Katharin...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On 1 Jan, 23:16, Boaz <boaz...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 1, 12:54 pm, Harry Bailey <unhomedivis...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jan 1, 7:06 pm, Wordsmith <wordsm...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: alt.movies.kubrick · Group Profile · Search for Words are trite in alt.movies.kubrick
Author: Boaz
Date: Jan 6, 2008 18:59
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:16:48 +1100, "Mark T" <moi@home000whatever105> wrote: "guardian Snow" <snowpheonix@eck.net.au> wrote: 2Pe 2:1 Kummel presents the arguments that make all critical scholars recognize that II Peter is a pseudepigraph (Introduction to the New Testament, pp. 430-4): "Critical scholars" begin with several unproven assumptions. One (or "two" depending on how
|
| Show full article (12.01Kb) · Show article thread |
|
 |
|
1 ·
2 ·
3 ·
4 ·
5 ·
6 ·
7 ·
8 ·
9 ·
next |
|
|