Winsocks
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 6 articles for 0.263 sec
On 12/05/2010 18:46, Jim Bunton wrote: > I have a vb application which uses winsock to "POST" an Http request > and report on the response > [windows XP ] > [vb 32 bit for Windows - over 10 yres old!] > gets an appropriate response > > I have written a similar application in VB in Access 2000 > It does not get the appropriate response it gives > 501 Method Not Implemented > index.html not     

Group: microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion · Group Profile · Search for Winsocks in microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion
Author: Dee Earley
Date: May 13, 2010 09:33

Bonjour, HD wrote: On parle d'IPv6... mais tout est il compatible avec l'IPv6 ? Pour ce qui est de Windows 2000 je pense qu'une mise à jour le rendra encore compatible... Pour NT à mon avis c'est cuit... Pas forcèment, il y avait des piles IPv6 non Microsoft sur Windows à une époque. Je pense en particulier à Trumpet Winsock: http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/6bone/1999
Show full article (1.16Kb)
"Sr Peabody" <NO-SPAMxixon63@yahoo.es> escribió en el mensaje news:hshh18$738$1@news.eternal-september.org... > Pues creo recordar que había que configurar el Trumpet Winsock (hablo de > Windows 3.1) para poder conectar por "dial-up" en PPP con el modem de > ¿9600 [...] Coñe, no me acordaba que antes de eso enredé con MS-DOS, modem 2400 y UUCP para correo. Experimentos previos con el Carbon     

Group: fr.comp.reseaux.ip · Group Profile · Search for Winsocks in fr.comp.reseaux.ip
Author: Francois Tigeot
Date: Jun 1, 2010 02:46

See below... On Thu, 13 May 2010 15:22:04 -0700 (PDT), stephen park <steebu@gmail.com> wrote: On May 13, 2:23 pm, Hector Santos <sant9...@gmail.com> wrote: Stephen, It does work. That is why I gave you other host names and ports to try it.  Its a simple "Dump Terminal" client application. Not sure what exactly you are looking for?  How to make Joe's code work? Yeah
Show full article (0.62Kb)
"The Bald Avenger" <la_direccion.esta@en.la.firma.es> escribió en el mensaje news:vrdmu51sdmks0tlq9dgen15mbe4fo39l86@4ax.com... > En un afortunado momento, tal que el Wed, 12 May 2010 20:37:10 +0200, > "Sr Peabody" <NO-SPAMxixon63@yahoo.es> comentaba en su mensaje > <hsesgs$ngs$1@news.eternal-september.org>: > > >>>>¿Y el gopher? ¿Es que nadie va a pensar en el gopher? >>> Eso se lo tendrás     

Group: es.comp.hardware.misc · Group Profile · Search for Winsocks in es.comp.hardware.misc
Author: Sr Peabody
Date: May 14, 2010 02:13

Hans, in einer 'optimalen' .NET-Welt würde der GC die Lebensdauer aller Objekte 'vollautomatisch' verwalten, da müsstest du gar nichts selber machen. Nun, bei diesem GC-Konzept ist der Zeitpunkt der Zerstörung 'undefiniert', der GC läuft irgendwann/gelegentlich ('non-deterministic'), um Objekte, die nicht mehr länger benötigt (= erreichbar/referenziert) werden, zu zerstören. Einige .NET
Show full article (0.49Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for Winsocks in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Joseph M. Newcomer
Date: May 13, 2010 20:51

Show full article (5.30Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: es.comp.hardware.misc · Group Profile · Search for Winsocks in es.comp.hardware.misc
Author: Sr Peabody
Date: May 13, 2010 11:38

Show full article (1.51Kb)
    

Group: microsoft.public.de.german.entwickler.dotnet.framework · Group Profile · Search for Winsocks in microsoft.public.de.german.entwickler.dotnet.framework
Author: Thomas Scheidegger
Date: May 13, 2010 06:24

Show full article (1.46Kb)