Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 23 articles for 0.015 sec
Re: Why aren't digital cameras film-quality yet?     

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile · Search for Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet in alt.philosophy
Author: Floyd L. Davidson
Date: Apr 16, 2008 14:59

... old mother-in-law cannot handle digital processing. But she can still load and unload a film camera. Don't give me the...as easy" - she's been handling film cameras for 70 some odd ...to try to learn to do digital. she doesn't need a computer...need to spend money on a digital camera, either. What a concept! ... spending even more money of film processing is more fun? -- Floyd L...
Show full article (0.79Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Why aren't digital cameras film-quality yet?     

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile · Search for Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet in alt.philosophy
Author: Alfred Molon
Date: Apr 15, 2008 22:58

In article <fu43kj$ui5$8@aioe.org>, Trent Thorax says... All those megapixels and still traditional methods are superior. They have surpassed film quality a long time ago. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
Show full article (0.36Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Why aren't digital cameras film-quality yet?     

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile · Search for Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet in alt.philosophy
Author: John
Date: Apr 17, 2008 06:37

... Is there gradient inside of one pixel space? Are you suggesting a film particle (a grain) has a gradient? It does not. Gradient qualities concern the depth of exposure in the emulsion. Thinner film == tendency to a greater contrast slope. T-Grain films use peverse... from film is black, the space between clusters. The equivalent in digital is white, or noise.)
Show full article (0.76Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Why aren't digital cameras film-quality yet?     

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile · Search for Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet in alt.philosophy
Author: triba_la_raza
Date: Apr 16, 2008 15:13

On Apr 16, 1:57 am, Bob Williams <mytbobnos...@cox.net> wrote: Trent Thorax wrote: All those megapixels and still traditional methods are superior. Zeno's paradox, anyone? -Trent Surely, you jest......or .......troll. Bob Williams why ae you so selfish..... "me, me, me".... grow some gonads, boy!
Show full article (0.33Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Why aren't digital cameras film-quality yet?     

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile · Search for Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet in alt.philosophy
Author: nospam
Date: Apr 16, 2008 11:16

... mother-in-law cannot handle digital processing. But she can still load and unload a film camera. Don't give me ... easy" - she's been handling film cameras for 70 some odd... try to learn to do digital. she doesn't need a ...s easier to remove than film, almost like an instamatic cartridge...it were a roll of film. an hour or two later...too complicated, hand the whole camera to the clerk. if she...
Show full article (1.06Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Why aren't digital cameras film-quality yet?     

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile · Search for Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet in alt.philosophy
Author: ray
Date: Apr 16, 2008 10:23

...<pre wrap=""><!----> Which is 'better' film or digital? Which is 'better' a ... majority of professional photographer feel digital is good enough not to warrant pursuing film anymore.&nbsp; Nikon now make ... maybe on other model of film camera.&nbsp; I do not ... curve where under certain circumstances film has an edge.<br> </body>... easy" - she's been handling film cameras for 70 some odd ...
Show full article (1.85Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Why aren't digital cameras film-quality yet?     

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile · Search for Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet in alt.philosophy
Author: ray
Date: Apr 16, 2008 08:20

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:42:04 -0700, Trent Thorax wrote: All those megapixels and still traditional methods are superior. Zeno's paradox, anyone? -Trent Which is 'better' film or digital? Which is 'better' a Mercedes or a dump truck? It depends, to a large extent, on what you are trying to do. IMHO neither film nor digital is 'superior' - they each have their place.
Show full article (0.39Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Why aren't digital cameras film-quality yet?     

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile · Search for Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet in alt.philosophy
Author: John
Date: Apr 16, 2008 06:05

...to define 'traditional'. April 16, 2008. There ya go. Film and digital are different. Some people have entirely different standards regarding quality. Quality is not necessarily simple metrics such as lp/mm, acutance...temporary issue of lens problems, especially wide, fast lenses with the digital sensor. If a person cannot see the difference, for better or...
Show full article (0.85Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Why aren't digital cameras film-quality yet?     

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile · Search for Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet in alt.philosophy
Author: ZerkonX
Date: Apr 17, 2008 06:07

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:42:04 -0700, Trent Thorax wrote: All those megapixels and still traditional methods are superior. Zeno's paradox, anyone? -Trent Is there gradient inside of one pixel space?
Show full article (0.22Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Why aren't digital cameras film-quality yet?     

Group: alt.philosophy · Group Profile · Search for Why aren t digital cameras film quality yet in alt.philosophy
Author: turtoni
Date: Apr 16, 2008 10:59

On Apr 16, 1:42 am, Trent Thorax <tthora...@marveljack.com> wrote: All those megapixels and still traditional methods are superior. Zeno's paradox, anyone? -Trent http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teMlv3ripSM
Show full article (0.22Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · next