... From: Michael Gordge <mikegordge@xtra.co.nz> Newsgroups: alt.philosophy Subject: Why Would A Kantian Want To ... Simple, so as they can manipulate reality, therefore the truth to mean what ever ... want it to mean. To render reality meaningless. Why would a Kantian want to argue that there are contradictions in reality? (the oppsite position of objectivism) Because ...
... reality meaningless. Incorrect. A Kantian would *not* argue that reality could be ... stop changing the subject, typical desperate Kantian, that is metahysics. which is why we might use the word "manipulative... yet defined or explained through objective reality? This is a little trickier, ... directly linked to sensory matter of reality, then its meaningless. Michael Gordge
...Simple, so as they can manipulate reality, therefore the truth to mean ... To render reality meaningless. Why would a Kantian want to argue that there are contradictions in reality? (the oppsite position of objectivism) ...necessarily tails and not heads. This Kantians call the nice -piffle- antinimy or ...to conceive the nature of transcendent reality. Kant thought the Antinomies cannot be...
... reality meaningless. Incorrect. A Kantian would *not* argue that reality could be manipulated:... as people or ideas, which is why we might use the word "..." about certain people, but the reality itself cannot be manipulated and is... argue that there are contradictions in reality? (the oppsite position of objectivism) ...say that. Perhaps people masquerading as Kantians do; in truth they are ...
...To render reality meaningless. Why would a Kantian want to argue that there are contradictions in reality? (the oppsite position of objectivism) ...there wasn't any contradictions in reality, and therefore he remained agnostic as...or not there are contradictions in reality. Do you seriously regard having a...s also plenty of examples of Kantians idiots offering examples of what they...
..., Michael Gordge <mikegor...@xtra.co.nz> wrote: Simple, so as they can manipulate reality, therefore the truth to mean what ever they want it to mean. To render reality meaningless. Why would a Kantian want to argue that there are contradictions in reality? (the oppsite position of objectivism) They do? I want to see it. Because ...
Simple, so as they can manipulate reality, therefore the truth to mean what ever they want it to mean. To render reality meaningless. Why would a Kantian want to argue that there are contradictions in reality? (the oppsite position of objectivism) Because clearly they want to make their own arbitrary contadictions, within their ...
..., but it does not establish "why it (the entity) actually has ...Law Of Identity does NOT establish why the entity has identity, (thats ...an entity has its identity in reality This tells us nothing. and ... identity, why? because that is all it has in reality it ... your argument goes: Entities in reality have one identity because A ... Are you really trying to argue that just because it is ...
... does establish, but it does not establish "why it (the entity) actually has that identity.... The Law Of Identity does NOT establish why the entity has identity, (thats YOUR job) an entity has its identity in reality and it (the entity) is already established and... one meaning, one and only one identity, why? because that is all it has in reality, it has ONE meaning that seperates it from...
...stop changing the subject, typical desperate Kantian, that is metahysics. The subject is manipulation of reality. Kantians, worth their salt, do not...to pre-Critical philosophy. which is why we might use the word "...yet defined or explained through objective reality? I've already explained about ... some connection between ourselves and reality. What does this relation consist of...
