Following up to Andy Pandy thats a silly conmment and its nothing to do with discrimination anyway. Using age as a criteria is obviously age discrimination by definition. descrimination in this meaning is *unreasonable* use of the criterion. Any *insurance* can choose to spread the risk over all policies at an equal fee of the claims devided by the policy holders. People
On Jun 11, 3:11 am, "Vaughn Simon" <vaughnsimonHATESS...@att.FAKE.net> wrote: Get at least three quotes, (which will take three complete applications, three physical exams, and 6 to 8 weeks). The "teaser" rate that they give you after a quick screening application means little. They won't like it, and will ask you why you are applying at other companies, but it is your privilege
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:09:33 -0800, rota6566 wrote: When you think about the best life insurance rate, you probably think about the cheapest rate possible; however, cheaper isn't always better. The popular cliché "You get what you pay for" is often true. If you pay an extremely low life insurance rate, you may in turn be getting an extremely low quality life insurance policy.
That depends... If the policy is a "whole life" policy, and has a "cash value", then the insurance will be considered a "family asset". This then becomes a discussion for the courts. The courts could order just about anything (absent an agreement by the two parties to the divorce). In my case, I had changed my beneficiary from my ex to my mom! She DEMANDED through her lawyer that she IMMEDIATELY
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:31:53 -0700, "BTIZ" <btiznospm2@cox.nospm.net> wrote: Why do you need a 1M 10year term policy? You should have at least 10x your income in life ins... to support those who depend on you (wife, kids, etc) Why term? it's the cheapest insurance there is. Why 10 years? perhaps he plans to be self-insured in 10 years. And I suspect I know why he went to Zander...must
