On 5/23/2011 9:41 PM, Daryl wrote: On 5/23/2011 7:06 PM, Matt Wiser wrote: In some ways, he is correct. Well, not many ways, actually. But the Buffs will be with us far longer than is planned. They keep moving the retirement date as they keep counting beans finding, in their horror, the cost of replacing it. And the arguments of exactly what would be needed to replace it.
On May 23, 4:03 pm, Daryl <dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote: On 5/23/2011 8:03 AM, hcobb wrote: http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=6531851&c=POL&s=TOP Contrary to popular belief, Shackelford said, a rapid acquisition has to comply with the same basic procedures that a normal program does. The difference, he said, is that the oversight of a rapid acquisitions
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 02:57:43 +0100 Chris <ngfb@chris-street.demon.co.uk> wrote: On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:11:14 +0100, George wrote: I want to run WSPR with my power into the antenna set at 1mW. Radio of choice in my FT817. How can I reduce its output to 1mW and how can I measure this? 73 George I'd have said that a 30dB attenuator is the way to go....
On 6/7/2010 10:57 AM, faulty spam <wuss@nj.verizon.net> deleted/bleated: On Jun 7, 9:32 am, Man_of_Mind restored the hilarious bitch-slappings of: On 6/6/2010 10:07 PM, faulty spam <wuss@nj.verizon.net> deleted/bleated: --- I think I can safely predict No, you're just trying to escape the fact that you can't show your 'work', because you copied the same flawed 'answers'
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 04:10:54 +0200, in uk.politics.misc, abelard <abelard3@abelard.org>, wrote On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:13:19 -0400, FACE <AFaceInTheCrowd@today.net> wrote: Going by the thread title, i can see it now out of an old WWII movie........... Sailors being tumbled out of their on-shore beds in the middle of the night, klaxons blaring; orders shouted; gangways crashing
