Weight
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 1645 articles for 1.285 sec
eunometic@yahoo.com.au wrote: > > I'm assuming there is no "weight" limit on the catapult. The immagine > the catapult would have a broad specification of > 1 firstly the force it can generate at say zero speed. > 2 secondly the maximum speed it can reach. > 3 maximum power it can transfer. > 4 the amount of energy it can transfer (I assume there is some kind of > steam reservoir or accumulator     

Group: rec.aviation.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for Weight in rec.aviation.military.naval
Author: John Weiss
Date: May 5, 2011 11:08

Dave Bowles wrote: The cats haven't changed much over the years. The A-3 was about the biggest thig to ever get catted off the pointy end, and that 73,000 pounds was approaching the max. I recall 80,000 pounds from a chat many years ago. An article on an NAS Lakehurst site tells of shooting a 79,000 pound sled, so that's about right. Carrier suitability trials of the already
Show full article (1.78Kb)
Hello Greg ! I have read few papers ! In which they construct the missing amplitudes by WEIGHTED LEAST SQUARES ! if you google "Reconstruction using least sqaure regularization", you will find plenty of papers ! Even on this website these people have solver written in C http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~potts/nfft/guide3/doc/group__solver.html 1. They calculate DFT 2. They apply weights     

Group: rec.aviation.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for Weight in rec.aviation.military.naval
Author: Steven P. McNicoll
Date: May 5, 2011 05:17

Hi everybody, I have a problem with pretty simple code - I use the nsGFF or the data imported from txt file. It works well with one data set, but doesn t work with another one (the same code, same structure of data (as far as I think), which I consider to be pretty similar. nstrain gives me error - could not load weights file error. Could anybody suggest what should I do to find out where is the
Show full article (0.51Kb)
On 28 Jan, 19:15, Nicky <ukc802466...@btconnect.com> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:41:30 -0800 (PST), Helen Back > > > > > > <SiriusC...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > >On 27 Jan, 14:03, Nicky <ukc802466...@btconnect.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:39:17 -0800 (PST), Helen Back > > >> <SiriusC...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > >> >Hi Nicky, > > >> >Im using my treadmill extensively, so burning     

Group: comp.softsys.matlab · Group Profile · Search for Weight in comp.softsys.matlab
Author: kk KKsingh
Date: May 31, 2010 22:10

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:41:30 -0800 (PST), Helen Back <SiriusC-63@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: On 27 Jan, 14:03, Nicky <ukc802466...@btconnect.com> wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:39:17 -0800 (PST), Helen Back <SiriusC...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: Hi Nicky, Im using my treadmill extensively, so burning fat and keeping numbers down consistently (rarely go above 5.4 these days)
Show full article (3.85Kb)
Hallo Claus, Am 06-09-2011 15:27, schrieb Claus Busch: > Am Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:18:41 +0200 schrieb Christof Kluß: >> Leider scheint >> jetzt aber ActiveChart.ChartType = xlXYScatter nicht mehr zu gehen. > > das PunktXY-Diagramm übernimmt die Werte so wie sie in der Tabelle > stehen 1:1. > Damit hat man den Vorteil, dass die Abstände zwischen den Datenpunkten > unterschiedlich sind, halt     

Group: comp.softsys.matlab · Group Profile · Search for Weight in comp.softsys.matlab
Author: babena barunikova
Date: May 13, 2010 13:47

On Sep 7, 3:54 am, Dean Markley <damark...@gmail.com> wrote: On Sep 5, 11:52 pm, Eunometic <eunome...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: On Sep 2, 12:08 am, Tankfixer <paul.carr...@gmail.c00m> wrote: In article <a80bdb75-fc01-40f7-a175-6ac1ff95f6e6 @fe21g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, - LIBERATOR markz...@ymail.com spouted ! On Aug 31, 10:56 am, "Keith Willshaw"
Show full article (0.58Kb)
On Sep 5, 11:52 pm, Eunometic <eunome...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > On Sep 2, 12:08 am, Tankfixer <paul.carr...@gmail.c00m> wrote: > > > > > In article <a80bdb75-fc01-40f7-a175-6ac1ff95f6e6 > > @fe21g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, - LIBERATOR markz...@ymail.com spouted > > ! > > > > On Aug 31, 10:56 am, "Keith Willshaw" <keithnos...@demon.co.uk> wrote: > > > > [quoted text muted] > > > > to keep     

Group: alt.support.diabetes · Group Profile · Search for Weight in alt.support.diabetes
Author: Helen Back
Date: Jan 29, 2010 02:15

Eunometic wrote: Turbofans still have enormous growth potential. Not only higher temperatures but intercooling and regeneration should drive efficiency towards 50%% while overzised ducted fans (like the German CRISP technology) or unducted fana. As far as I can see engines alone can achieve a reduction od fuel consumption of almost 50%%, on top of which there will
Show full article (2.49Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.support.diabetes · Group Profile · Search for Weight in alt.support.diabetes
Author: Nicky
Date: Jan 28, 2010 11:15

Show full article (1.80Kb)
    

Group: de.comp.officepakete.msoffice.excel · Group Profile · Search for Weight in de.comp.officepakete.msoffice.excel
Author: Christof Kluß
Date: Sep 7, 2011 00:03

Show full article (2.55Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Weight in rec.aviation.military
Author: Eunometic
Date: Sep 6, 2011 17:26

Show full article (3.58Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Weight in rec.aviation.military
Author: Dean Markley
Date: Sep 6, 2011 10:54

Show full article (2.28Kb)
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Weight in rec.aviation.military
Author: John Weiss
Date: Aug 17, 2011 15:56

Show full article (0.88Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next