Voteonmarriage
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 10 articles for 0.029 sec
Coakley to Fight for Gay Marriage Vows challenge if amendment OK'd By Megan Woolhouse, Globe Staff | May 12, 2007 CAMBRIDGE -- Attorney General Martha Coakley said last night that if Massachusetts voters were to approve a ban on same-sex marriages, she would back any efforts to challenge the measure on constitutional grounds. A constitutional ban could go on the ballot in November 2008     

Group: alt.politics.usa.constitution · Group Profile · Search for Voteonmarriage in alt.politics.usa.constitution
Author: last_post
Date: May 12, 2007 07:25

Coakley to Fight for Gay Marriage Vows challenge if amendment OK'd By Megan Woolhouse, Globe Staff | May 12, 2007 CAMBRIDGE -- Attorney General Martha Coakley said last night that if Massachusetts voters were to approve a ban on same-sex marriages, she would back any efforts to challenge the measure on constitutional grounds. A constitutional ban could go on the ballot in November 2008
Show full article (4.51Kb)
D.Tracy <dtracy@hotmail.com> wrote in news:o51eo2dkf9mm9kdkmh04jbvaqb4mggug1f@4ax.com: > > > > Andy Rooney could have said this on "60 Minutes" a few weeks back: If you really know Andy Rooney's politics, I don't think you'd buy that he'd say this stuff. He about as leftist and liberal as they come. Just like most of the people in our television media today. To me it doesn't sound     

Group: talk.politics.misc · Group Profile · Search for Voteonmarriage in talk.politics.misc
Author: last_post
Date: May 12, 2007 07:25

D.Tracy <dtracy@hotmail.com> wrote in news:o51eo2dkf9mm9kdkmh04jbvaqb4mggug1f@4ax.com: Andy Rooney could have said this on "60 Minutes" a few weeks back: If you really know Andy Rooney's politics, I don't think you'd buy that he'd say this stuff. He about as leftist and liberal as they come. Just like most of the people in our television media today. To me it doesn't sound
Show full article (4.51Kb)
Maybe Andy Rooney could have said it, but he didn't. In fact, he stated publicly that he never said anything close to this. http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/rooney4.asp Just more radical reactionary rightwing bullshit. "D.Tracy" <dtracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:o51eo2dkf9mm9kdkmh04jbvaqb4mggug1f@4ax.com... > > > > Andy Rooney could have said this on "60 Minutes"     

Group: soc.veterans · Group Profile · Search for Voteonmarriage in soc.veterans
Author: the Curmudgeon
Date: Dec 21, 2006 01:25

Maybe Andy Rooney could have said it, but he didn't. In fact, he stated publicly that he never said anything close to this. http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/rooney4.asp Just more radical reactionary rightwing bullshit. "D.Tracy" <dtracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:o51eo2dkf9mm9kdkmh04jbvaqb4mggug1f@4ax.com... Andy Rooney could have said this on "60 Minutes"
Show full article (4.54Kb) · Show article thread
Andy Rooney could have said this on "60 Minutes" a few weeks back: I don't think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers. The only things I can think of that are truly discriminatory are things like the United Negro College Fund, Jet Magazine, Black Entertainment Television, and Miss Black America. Try to have things like the UnitedCaucasianCollege Fund, Cloud Magazine     

Group: soc.men · Group Profile · Search for Voteonmarriage in soc.men
Author: the Curmudgeon
Date: Dec 21, 2006 01:25

Andy Rooney could have said this on "60 Minutes" a few weeks back: I don't think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers. The only things I can think of that are truly discriminatory are things like the United Negro College Fund, Jet Magazine, Black Entertainment Television, and Miss Black America. Try to have things like the UnitedCaucasianCollege Fund, Cloud Magazine
Show full article (4.54Kb) · Show article thread
The Boston Globe The Constitution's guardrails By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist | Dec. 17, 2006 A LAWSUIT filed in US District Court last week accuses 109 Massachusetts lawmakers of violating the US Constitution. The plaintiffs are leaders of VoteOnMarriage.org , a grass-roots campaign to amend the Massachusetts constitution by defining marriage "only as the union of one man and one woman     

Group: soc.veterans · Group Profile · Search for Voteonmarriage in soc.veterans
Author: Joe S.
Date: Dec 18, 2006 13:46

The Boston Globe The Constitution's guardrails By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist | Dec. 17, 2006 A LAWSUIT filed in US District Court last week accuses 109 Massachusetts lawmakers of violating the US Constitution. The plaintiffs are leaders of VoteOnMarriage.org , a grass-roots campaign to amend the Massachusetts constitution by defining marriage "only as the union of one man and one woman
Show full article (4.48Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.men · Group Profile · Search for Voteonmarriage in soc.men
Author: Joe S.
Date: Dec 18, 2006 13:46

Show full article (4.48Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.veterans · Group Profile · Search for Voteonmarriage in soc.veterans
Author: D.Tracy
Date: Dec 18, 2006 13:24

Show full article (3.98Kb)
    

Group: soc.men · Group Profile · Search for Voteonmarriage in soc.men
Author: D.Tracy
Date: Dec 18, 2006 13:24

Show full article (3.98Kb)
    

Group: alt.politics.usa.constitution · Group Profile · Search for Voteonmarriage in alt.politics.usa.constitution
Author: last_post
Date: Dec 17, 2006 06:52

Show full article (4.61Kb)
    

Group: alt.society.liberalism · Group Profile · Search for Voteonmarriage in alt.society.liberalism
Author: last_post
Date: Dec 17, 2006 06:52

Show full article (4.61Kb)