Visabilty
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 25 articles for 0.303 sec
SQL Server is merely an optional component on the officeCd. If your IT department won't give you an optional component on the Office CD-- then you should complain to their boss. Most bosses would _LOVE_ to have a junior-sized database developer _EVOLVE_ into a entry level SQL Server engineer-- for no cost. More importantly-- if you call yourself a database person-- and you don't know SQL     

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Visabilty in microsoft.public.access
Author: a a r o n . k e m p f
Date: Aug 3, 2008 12:06

Poor, poor, pitiful aaron. He passes by an opportunity to validly recommend his own personal-favorite database, which likely is the best answer for _the database application as described by the original poster_, but chooses to make a fool of himself in public once again by: (1) recommending a heavy-duty server database as the default for an Access user which is not a good idea at all (just
Show full article (4.15Kb) · Show article thread
Yes I assume there is a learning curve for both. i do not know what project it is and or your budjets but it all depens on your requirements as well. If you need more help contact me - where are you located? -- Evan Camilleri http://www.HolisticRD.com http://www.DotNetMushroom.com http://www.MobileSaleman.com "acss" <joekru98@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:CBF47739-2247     

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Visabilty in microsoft.public.access
Author: So Sorry For Poor Aaron
Date: Aug 3, 2008 11:37

ASP.NET has a formidable learning curve, and I'd suggest that you hire a professional if you don't want to spend the next year or so learning it. SQL-Server, is not that difficult to learn but tweaking and administration is a professional task. The most important part of database design, other than a knowledge of relational database principles, which is common to all databases, is getting
Show full article (3.40Kb) · Show article thread
SQL Server should be your default database. if you don't know how to use it-- you should drop everything and get up to speed. Jet just doesn't cut it for nearly _ANY_ corporate development. -Aaron On Aug 2, 10:15 am, acss <joekr...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Excellent suggestions from both you and Evan and certainly appreciate the > professional direction. Just one question in regards     

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Visabilty in microsoft.public.access
Author: Evan Camilleri
Date: Aug 3, 2008 04:20

Excellent suggestions from both you and Evan and certainly appreciate the professional direction. Just one question in regards to SQL-server express and or ASPNet and that is in regards to time required to learn and deploy? I suspect that i will need the IT department for server assistance since i am not knowledgable in this area. Thank you "Arvin Meyer [MVP]" wrote: Access would
Show full article (2.45Kb) · Show article thread
I would not use Access for this! Use ASP.NET front end and SQL server back-end! -- Evan Camilleri http://www.HolisticRD.com http://www.DotNetMushroom.com http://www.MobileSaleman.com "acss" <joekru98@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:56F4ADCE-3DDD-48FD-82D4-235F21288DA7@microsoft.com... > Need to design a database which will be used for a large corporation and > not > sure     

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Visabilty in microsoft.public.access
Author: Arvin Meyer [MVP]
Date: Aug 2, 2008 20:38

Access would probably not be a good choice. I suggest SQL-Server Express for a limited number of users, or the full SQL-Server for unlimited users. While Access (actually JET) works fine for a smallish number of users on the web, it cannot take heavy web pressure. I have had a website where 8 users requesting complex reports could bring it down in less than 20 minutes, and another site where
Show full article (2.88Kb) · Show article thread
On Jul 2, 7:32 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: > "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message > > news:ra1o64lqiod1shb33ncp3puqh1391m7ba2@4ax.com > > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 16:31:55 -0400, "Republican Liar" > > <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote: > > >>"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message > >>news:d4im64dg4ggceeunlaeuiovp99f57e85vs@4ax.com > >>> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008     

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Visabilty in microsoft.public.access
Author: a a r o n . k e m p f
Date: Aug 2, 2008 19:40

Show full article (2.27Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Visabilty in microsoft.public.access
Author: acss
Date: Aug 2, 2008 10:15

Show full article (1.92Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Visabilty in microsoft.public.access
Author: Evan Camilleri
Date: Aug 2, 2008 09:50

Show full article (0.67Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Visabilty in microsoft.public.access
Author: Arvin Meyer [MVP]
Date: Aug 2, 2008 05:19

Show full article (1.47Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.access · Group Profile · Search for Visabilty in microsoft.public.access
Author: acss
Date: Aug 2, 2008 01:36

Show full article (0.35Kb)
    

Group: alt.politics.gwbush · Group Profile · Search for Visabilty in alt.politics.gwbush
Author: ejordan
Date: Jul 3, 2008 22:47

Show full article (11.29Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · next