Viewissue
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 17 articles for 0.302 sec
"The solution to this problem is to produce PNG images with no gamma correction information in them, so that Internet Explorer will not attempt to correct their display. Unfortunately, Photoshop's "Save for Web" feature doesn't give you that option, so you need to use a separate tool to strip out the gamma correction information that it writes." The problem is specific to PNG images created     

Group: macromedia.dreamweaver · Group Profile · Search for Viewissue in macromedia.dreamweaver
Author: Murray *ACE*
Date: Jul 24, 2008 04:48

Sam Wormley wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:49:22 +0000: Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote: Sam Wormley wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:00:03 +0000: MOND is Dead? ...most likely http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/density.html#MOND http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/old_new_cosmo.html (snip) Dark Matter is Dead (September 2007): http://www
Show full article (1.09Kb) · Show article thread
Sam Wormley wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:49:22 +0000: > Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote: >> Sam Wormley wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:00:03 +0000: >> >>> MOND is Dead? ...most likely >>> >>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/density.html#MOND >>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/old_new_cosmo.html >> >> (snip) >> >> Dark Matter is Dead (September 2007): >> >> http://www     

Group: macromedia.dreamweaver · Group Profile · Search for Viewissue in macromedia.dreamweaver
Author: CaryD
Date: Jul 23, 2008 16:00

Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote: Sam Wormley wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:00:03 +0000: MOND is Dead? ...most likely http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/density.html#MOND http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/old_new_cosmo.html (snip) Dark Matter is Dead (September 2007): http://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/viewIssue.asp?id=837 More on Dark
Show full article (0.29Kb) · Show article thread
Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:00:03 +0000: > >> MOND is Dead? ...most likely >> >> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/density.html#MOND >> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/old_new_cosmo.html > > (snip) > > Dark Matter is Dead (September 2007): > > http://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/viewIssue.asp?id=837 > >> More on Dark     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Viewissue in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Juan R. González-Álvarez
Date: Jul 1, 2008 02:17

Sam Wormley wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:00:03 +0000: MOND is Dead? ...most likely http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/density.html#MOND http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/old_new_cosmo.html (snip) Dark Matter is Dead (September 2007): http://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/viewIssue.asp?id=837 More on Dark Matter http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog
Show full article (2.43Kb) · Show article thread
Sam Wormley wrote on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:00:03 +0000: > MOND is Dead? ...most likely > > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/density.html#MOND > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/old_new_cosmo.html (snip) Dark Matter is Dead (September 2007): http://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/viewIssue.asp?id=837 > > More on Dark Matter > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Viewissue in sci.physics
Author: Juan R. González-Álvarez
Date: Jul 1, 2008 02:17

Sam Wormley wrote on Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:30:47 +0000: Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote: MOND has been empirically verified since years ago. And with a precision that no GR+CDM model can match. Of course, this recent work, if correct, simply add another new test favouring MOND over the unreliable GR+CDM model. Ok, since you deleted all my links and references i will
Show full article (2.43Kb) · Show article thread
Sam Wormley wrote on Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:30:47 +0000: > Juan R. González-Álvarez wrote: > >> MOND has been empirically verified since years ago. And with a >> precision that no GR+CDM model can match. Of course, this recent work, >> if correct, simply add another new test favouring MOND over the >> unreliable GR+CDM model. >> >> Ok, since you deleted all my links and references i will     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Viewissue in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Sam Wormley
Date: Jun 30, 2008 11:49

Show full article (2.04Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Viewissue in sci.physics
Author: Sam Wormley
Date: Jun 30, 2008 11:49

Show full article (2.04Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Viewissue in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Juan R. González-Álvarez
Date: Jun 30, 2008 11:04

Show full article (1.84Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Viewissue in sci.physics
Author: Juan R. González-Álvarez
Date: Jun 30, 2008 11:04

Show full article (1.84Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Viewissue in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Juan R. González-Álvarez
Date: Jun 23, 2008 05:06

Show full article (1.79Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Viewissue in sci.physics
Author: Juan R. González-Álvarez
Date: Jun 23, 2008 05:06

Show full article (1.79Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next