On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:38:45 -0700, Met-in-PR wrote: On Sep 22, 7:01 pm, Ruben <ru...@www2.mrbrklyn.com> wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:56:00 -0700, Met-in-PR wrote: We are talking about 2006, not the years before. Their 83-78 record means they did not dominated the league during the year. They actually had the worst record of all playoff teams: W L
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:56:00 -0700, Met-in-PR wrote: We are talking about 2006, not the years before. Their 83-78 record means they did not dominated the league during the year. They actually had the worst record of all playoff teams: W L Mets 97 65 SDP 88 74 LAD 88 74 Stl 83 78 Rught They also had Pujols, Edmonds, Rollins, and a solid starting
On Sep 21, 2:07 pm, DonFromBa...@webtv.net wrote: Gnork says: <<Bad News: Drew and Lowell out of the lineup, news on Drew still bad. (They should have sent him to a chiropractor as I suggested). Varitek now 3 for his last 33. Last 4 months = 3 1/2 terrible, 1/2 good. Lowrie has stopped hitting.Francona still vetern centric as he boneheadedly admitted recently. >> Lowrie is
Gnork wrote: Good News: Red Sox seem to be able to score on some guy named Richmond. Matsuzaka pitching well. Ortiz seems to have his home run groove. Bad News: Drew and Lowell out of the lineup, news on Drew still bad. (They should have sent him to a chiropractor as I suggested). Varitek now 3 for his last 33. Last 4 months = 3 1/2 terrible, 1/2 good.
