On Apr 4, 1:16 am, Augustine <jacksones...@hotmail.com> wrote: And then remember, sir, that this age of "progress" is now hard at work producing human-animal hybrids. Does nightmarish freakery like this not fall into the category of forbidden knowledge for you? Do you agree that it would be better not to grasp at this knowledge? No, I think human animal hybrids can be a good thing
<Sean_MacCloud@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:36a073d4-d531-4635-b481-164f85822223@d62g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... [snip] No, he is correct. But it didn't just start in the 70s; and it aint just about to start. It is the human social condition for millenia, snowballing. ****True to a point, the current phase of the problem started in the 50's and especially 60's with modern feminism
"DanielSan" <danielsan1977@gmail.com> wrote in message news:vqydnfV_9ckQl1banZ2dnUVZ_tKinZ2d@comcast.com... Ips-Switch said the following on 3/2/2008 10:02 AM: The Fossil record basically didn't support gradualist, set-by-step evolution, though in its broad outline it seemed to support some sort of "evolution" [i.e., change or development] in the history of life on earth.
"Clyde Squid" <clydesquid@gmail.com> wrote in message news:195f8a26-4b4c-4164-a067-90175146a347@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com... On Mar 2, 12:02 pm, Ips-Switch <Ips...@spamnot.com> wrote: The Fossil record basically didn't support gradualist, set-by-step evolution, though in its broad outline it seemed to support some sort of "evolution" [i.e., change or development] in the history
