> use and would you recommend it over VSS for simple file version control? I don't really think there is much to choose between them for simple file version control. In Windows, it is common to use the Tortoise client for Subversion. Tortoise and Subversion are free. VSS is old, and SVN is cross-platform, so neither really feels like a modern Windows application. SVN is better than PVCS
SVN is a better version of VCS. It has a complex and unhelpful branching and merging system, but it is cross-platform, and faster than VSS, which is very old. Apart from the Access Add-on, which you rightly condemn, did you have any problems with VSS? (david) "Jim Franklin" <byebyespam@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:2wSzk.182850$XF5.35314@newsfe12.ams2... Hi, I have a
Hi, I have a number of Access databases shared across several different machines (couple of desktops, laptop etc.) I would like to implement some version control software to make sure I am never making changes to more than one copy of a db at a time. Does anyone have any suggestions? I have used Visual SourceSafe and found it to be somewhat unreliable (especially using the Access Add
> From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:HP3000-L@raven.utc.edu] On Behalf Of Duane Percox Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:08 PM To: HP3000-L@raven.utc.edu Subject: Re: Version Control Software For source code version control, depending on where you want to keep the repository, and where you like to do your editing, git may work, http://git.or.cz/ , subversion may work
> -----Original Message----- From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU] On Behalf Of Craig Lalley Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 2:49 PM After searching the archives, to no avail. What Version Control Software is currently available for the HP3000 in a predominately COBOL environment? TIA -Craig Craig: I was able
