At 21 Feb 2008 19:01:45 -0800 SMS wrote: Does AT&T have something similar to Verizon where you can specify a nickname (nickname@vtext.com) and only accept text messages sent to that nickname? I don't know. T-Mo does the nickname thing, but it's simply an alias- they "can't" (translation: won't) block messages sent to the numeric address. In fact, unlike Verizon, T-Mo "can't" (won't
Todd H. wrote: Just noticed an unpleasant bit on this month's statement: "Effective 3/30/08, AT&T will charge 20 cents for text/instant messags and 30cents for picture video messages sent or received on a pay per use basis." The old rate for text was 15 cents. Ouch. Verizon is sure to follow with a similar increase. Clearly the carriers are going to continue to
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message news:e89of3p1i7kvd5sod3745ld75msbsilp73@4ax.com... http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070927/nyth062.html?.v=101 BASKING RIDGE, N.J., Sept. 27 /PRNewswire/ -- On Wednesday, September 26, Verizon Wireless received a letter from NARAL regarding the company's policy on text messaging. The following statement may be attributed
Wrong once again, "J Young" <younginsights@aol.com> wrote in message news:1190909862.044729.216140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com... Saying it had the right to block "controversial or unsavory" text messages, Verizon Wireless has rejected a request from Naral Pro- Choice America, the abortion rights group, to make Verizon's mobile network available for a text-message program. As usual
