... don't you set up a blog? You could then rant to your hearts content, you wouldn't have to suffer people asking awkward questions and the rest of us could have sensible discussions about a varity of transport topics. What a great idea! Gollum's daily blog. Perhaps one of us should set it up for him. It's intereesting that he hasn't commented on the idea, although not ...
... Then why don't you set up a blog? You could then rant to your hearts content, you wouldn't have to suffer people asking awkward questions and the rest of us could have sensible discussions about a varity of transport topics. What a great idea! �Gollum's daily blog. �Perhaps one of us should set it up for him. Already done. www.dailymail.co.uk LOL!
... do not respond. Then why don't you set up a blog? You could then rant to your hearts content, you wouldn't have to suffer people asking awkward questions and the rest of us could have sensible discussions about a varity of transport topics. What a great idea! Gollum's daily blog. Perhaps one of us should set it up for him. Already done. www.dailymail.co.uk
... dominate this transport newsgroup. Please, please, do not respond. Then why don't you set up a blog? You could then rant to your hearts content, you wouldn't have to suffer people asking awkward questions and the rest of us could have sensible discussions about a varity of transport topics. What a great idea! Gollum's daily blog. Perhaps one of us should set it up for him.
...24:51 +0100, "Brimstone" <brimstone520-ng03@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: Please, please, do not respond. Then why don't you set up a blog? You could then rant to your hearts content, you wouldn't have to suffer people asking awkward questions and the rest of us could have sensible discussions about a varity of transport topics. Best if he does it on his Jutiper Arse. Derek
... from the usual personal insults, and occasional death threats, from the motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup. Please, please, do not respond. Then why don't you set up a blog? You could then rant to your hearts content, you wouldn't have to suffer people asking awkward questions and the rest of us could have sensible discussions about a varity of transport topics.
...the lesser persons who comprise it; that it has interests and goals which override or transcend those of its constituent persons, who are then presumed to owe obeisance, fealty, piety, or other varities of deference or subservience to the uberperson. So this is playing fast and loose with metaphor. "We are going to attack Saddam" is a metaphor and organic fallacy for "We...
... it; that it has interests and goals which override or transcend those of its constituent persons, who are then presumed to owe obeisance, fealty, piety, or other varities of deference or subservience to the uberperson. Depends on how far the individual consciousness has developed. The pope needs catholics. The 'I" has no such needs....
... who comprise it; that it has interests and goals which override or transcend those of its constituent persons, who are then presumed to owe obeisance, fealty, piety, or other varities of deference or subservience to the uberperson. So this is playing fast and loose with metaphor. "We are going to attack Saddam" is a metaphor and organic fallacy for "...
... persons who comprise it; that it has interests and goals which override or transcend those of its constituent persons, who are then presumed to owe obeisance, fealty, piety, or other varities of deference or subservience to the uberperson. So this is playing fast and loose with metaphor. "We are going to attack Saddam" is a metaphor and organic fallacy for "We...
