Vanee
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 27 articles for 0.264 sec
On Sep 7, 12:46 am, Darryl Ramm <darryl.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/1/11 2:44 PM, Bill D wrote: > [snip] > > > This is yet another case where an angle of attack indicator with stall > > warning stick vibrator would have saved a life.  Tiny cellphone/pager > > vibrator motors embedded in the stick grip would be an excellent stall > > warning. > > I have no idea how you know enough about what     

Group: rec.aviation.soaring · Group Profile · Search for Vanee in rec.aviation.soaring
Author: Ramy
Date: Sep 7, 2011 01:40

On 9/1/11 2:44 PM, Bill D wrote: [snip] This is yet another case where an angle of attack indicator with stall warning stick vibrator would have saved a life. Tiny cellphone/pager vibrator motors embedded in the stick grip would be an excellent stall warning. I have no idea how you know enough about what was going on with the aircraft and its pilot (especially inside his head/his
Show full article (5.24Kb) · Show article thread
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:46:20 +0100, "Keith Willshaw" <keithnospam@demon.co.uk> wrote: >Paul Saccani wrote: >> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:18:45 +0100, "Keith Willshaw" >> <keithnospam@demon.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> Well now the British authorities reported that around 10%% of German >>> bombs dropped on the UK during WW2 failed to explode so I am >>> a little sceptical about the claim that German     

Group: rec.aviation.soaring · Group Profile · Search for Vanee in rec.aviation.soaring
Author: Darryl Ramm
Date: Sep 7, 2011 00:46

On Jun 1, 7:40 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote: On May 31, 8:11 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote: On May 31, 3:31 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote: On May 30, 2:48 pm, Timo Nieminen <t...@physics.uq.edu.au> wrote: Dear Timo:  I like that you have had a broad exposure to the world of physics.  My New Physics is different
Show full article (4.83Kb)
On Jun 6, 11:44 pm, "Tim BandTech.com" <tttppp...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Tim: Light always EMITS at speed 'c' (which I rename IVL, for the Intrinsic Velocity of Light). But the velocity of the traveling light is influenced by the speed of the moving source—plus or minus 'v''. All blue shifted light is EXCEEDING velocity 'c'. Timo should explain WHY he is concerned with "momentum" in photons     

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Vanee in rec.aviation.military
Author: Paul Saccani
Date: May 3, 2011 04:13

On Jun 6, 9:02 pm, Timo Nieminen <t...@physics.uq.edu.au> wrote: Dear Timo: "Momentum", first and foremost, requires that there be a moving MASS. Photons are MASSLESS, and thus are without momentum. So, there is nothing to be... "reversed". — NoEinstein — On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Tim BandTech.com wrote: On Jun 6, 4:44 pm, Timo Nieminen <t...@physics.uq.edu.au> wrote: On Jun 6,
Show full article (5.81Kb)
UA, how much of the effectiveness of a thoery of "curved space" can be attributed to assuming Pascal's absolute vacuum, "in" space? >    1) GPS. thus: isn't the "recoil of atoms," the change of orbitals of electrons? > http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0402011 > atoms "recoil" when their orbital electrons emit photons. Photons > *must* carry momentum. thus: to put it differently, Bucky     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Vanee in sci.physics
Author: BURT
Date: Jun 7, 2010 17:23

UA, how much of the effectiveness of a thoery of "curved space" can be attributed to assuming Pascal's absolute vacuum, "in" space?    1) GPS. thus: isn't the "recoil of atoms," the change of orbitals of electrons? http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0402011 atoms "recoil" when their orbital electrons emit photons. Photons *must* carry momentum. thus: to put it differently, Bucky
Show full article (7.11Kb)
isn't the "recoil of atoms," the change of orbitals of electrons? > http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0402011 > atoms "recoil" when their orbital electrons emit photons.  Photons > *must* carry momentum. thus: to put it differently, Bucky thought that "behold, the tetrahedron" was a proof of 4CT, but it just shows the *neccesity* of (at least) four colors, not the sufficiency thereof. (and     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Vanee in sci.physics
Author: NoEinstein
Date: Jun 7, 2010 13:09

isn't the "recoil of atoms," the change of orbitals of electrons? http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0402011 atoms "recoil" when their orbital electrons emit photons.  Photons *must* carry momentum. thus: to put it differently, Bucky thought that "behold, the tetrahedron" was a proof of 4CT, but it just shows the *neccesity* of (at least) four colors, not the sufficiency thereof. (and
Show full article (11.34Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Vanee in sci.physics
Author: NoEinstein
Date: Jun 7, 2010 12:57

Show full article (10.68Kb)
    

Group: sci.research.careers · Group Profile · Search for Vanee in sci.research.careers
Author: spudnik
Date: May 13, 2010 20:51

Show full article (1.79Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Vanee in sci.physics
Author: spudnik
Date: May 13, 2010 20:51

Show full article (1.79Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Vanee in sci.physics.relativity
Author: spudnik
Date: May 13, 2010 20:21

Show full article (1.63Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Vanee in sci.physics
Author: spudnik
Date: May 13, 2010 20:21

Show full article (1.63Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · next