Validified
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 9 articles for 0.303 sec
http://www.judibari.org/Ryan050701.html Statement of John C. Ryan May 7, 2001 I, John C. Ryan, was a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) from Feb. 28, 1966 to Oct. 11, 1987, assigned to Phoenix and Yuma, AZ (1 yr), Utica, NY (9 yrs), East St. Louis, IL (5 yrs) and Peoria, IL (7yrs). Most of my career I specialized in organized crime (OC) investigations. I also worked     

Group: misc.activism.progressive · Group Profile · Search for Validified in misc.activism.progressive
Author: rich
Date: Dec 9, 2007 12:37

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 03:17:09 GMT, Zaghadka <zaghadka@hotmail.com> wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:32:19 -0500, in alt.fan.mozilla, businessman@nomail.com wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:09:00 +0000 (UTC), john sumner <josumner1965@cs.com> wrote: SteveG <_@_._> wrote in news:IOcPh.2813$NK2.1637@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk: John may (or may not) lack comprehension skills
Show full article (15.96Kb)
Leonidas Jones wrote on 31/03/2007 03:03 +0100: > SteveG wrote: >> businessman@nomail.com wrote: >>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:05:11 +0000 (UTC), john sumner >>> <josumner1965@cs.com> wrote: >>> >>>> businessman@nomail.com wrote in >>>> news:e12q039kquehgge27c27f6h8dabjof94lv@4ax.com: > /snip/ >> John may (or may not) lack comprehension skills but I have to tell you >> that "validify" is NOT     

Group: alt.fan.mozilla · Group Profile · Search for Validified in alt.fan.mozilla
Author: businessman
Date: Mar 31, 2007 11:36

SteveG wrote: businessman@nomail.com wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:05:11 +0000 (UTC), john sumner <josumner1965@cs.com> wrote: businessman@nomail.com wrote in news:e12q039kquehgge27c27f6h8dabjof94lv@4ax.com: /snip/ John may (or may not) lack comprehension skills but I have to tell you that "validify" is NOT an English word. I'm guessing your American and exercising
Show full article (3.85Kb)
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:09:00 +0000 (UTC), john sumner <josumner1965@cs.com> wrote: >SteveG <_@_._> wrote in >news:IOcPh.2813$NK2.1637@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk: >> John may (or may not) lack comprehension skills but I have to tell you >> that "validify" is NOT an English word. I'm guessing your American and >> exercising your "right" to make up words just because you don't know the >     

Group: alt.fan.mozilla · Group Profile · Search for Validified in alt.fan.mozilla
Author: Tony Raven
Date: Mar 31, 2007 00:43

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:38:32 GMT, SteveG <_@_._> wrote: businessman@nomail.com wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:05:11 +0000 (UTC), john sumner <josumner1965@cs.com> wrote: businessman@nomail.com wrote in news:e12q039kquehgge27c27f6h8dabjof94lv@4ax.com: Neither. Just sharing what I found on the website link that I included in my post. If you actually read
Show full article (0.96Kb)
SteveG <_@_._> wrote in news:IOcPh.2813$NK2.1637@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk: > John may (or may not) lack comprehension skills but I have to tell you > that "validify" is NOT an English word. I'm guessing your American and > exercising your "right" to make up words just because you don't know the > correct one to use. Try "validate" instead :-) > > <flame proof jacket now donned in anticipation     

Group: alt.fan.mozilla · Group Profile · Search for Validified in alt.fan.mozilla
Author: Leonidas Jones
Date: Mar 30, 2007 19:03

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:05:11 +0000 (UTC), john sumner <josumner1965@cs.com> wrote: businessman@nomail.com wrote in news:e12q039kquehgge27c27f6h8dabjof94lv@4ax.com: Neither. Just sharing what I found on the website link that I included in my post. If you actually read my whole post, Firefox 2.0x came in almost identical, just a fraction of a percent lower. On the other
Show full article (0.70Kb)
David Winsemius wrote: > > You appear to be under the all too common misconception that the > independent variables need to be distributed normally. They do not. > (Otherwise how would you be able to have categorical variables as > predictors?) Glad to hear someone else comment on this Frequent Fallacy. > > Only the residuals of the model need to be normally distributed Actually they     

Group: alt.fan.mozilla · Group Profile · Search for Validified in alt.fan.mozilla
Author: businessman
Date: Mar 30, 2007 18:31

Show full article (1.23Kb)
    

Group: alt.fan.mozilla · Group Profile · Search for Validified in alt.fan.mozilla
Author: businessman
Date: Mar 30, 2007 17:21

Show full article (1.92Kb)
    

Group: alt.fan.mozilla · Group Profile · Search for Validified in alt.fan.mozilla
Author: john sumner
Date: Mar 30, 2007 12:09

Show full article (0.54Kb)
    

Group: alt.fan.mozilla · Group Profile · Search for Validified in alt.fan.mozilla
Author: businessman
Date: Mar 30, 2007 07:54

Show full article (1.35Kb)
    

Group: sci.stat.math · Group Profile · Search for Validified in sci.stat.math
Author: Reef Fish
Date: Aug 1, 2006 18:54

Show full article (0.93Kb) · Show article thread